The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques. We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates.Aims
Methods
There has been an evolution recently in the management of unstable
fractures of the ankle with a trend towards direct fixation of a
posterior malleolar fragment. Within these fractures, Haraguchi
type 2 fractures extend medially and often cannot be fixed using
a standard posterolateral approach. Our aim was to describe the
posteromedial approach to address these fractures and to assess
its efficacy and safety. We performed a review of 15 patients with a Haraguchi type 2
posterior malleolar fracture which was fixed using a posteromedial
approach. Five patients underwent initial temporary spanning external
fixation. The outcome was assessed at a median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile
range (IQR) 17 to 36) using the Olerud and Molander score and radiographs were
assessed for the quality of the reduction.Aims
Patients and Methods
