Minimally invasive fixation of pelvic fragility fractures is recommended to reduce pain and allow early mobilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of two different stabilization techniques in bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum (BFFS). A non-randomized, prospective study was carried out in a level 1 trauma centre. BFFS in 61 patients (mean age 80 years (SD 10); four male, 57 female) were treated surgically with bisegmental transsacral stablization (BTS; n = 41) versus spinopelvic fixation (SP; n = 20). Postoperative full weightbearing was allowed. The outcome was evaluated at two timepoints: discharge from inpatient treatment (TP1; Fitbit tracking, Zebris stance analysis), and ≥ six months (TP2; Fitbit tracking, Zebris analysis, based on modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Majeed Score (MS), and the 12-Item Short Form Survey 12 (SF-12). Fracture healing was assessed by CT. The primary outcome parameter of functional recovery was the per-day step count; the secondary parameter was the subjective outcome assessed by questionnaires.Aims
Methods
This study aimed to analyze the correlation between transverse
process (TP) fractures of the fourth (L4) and fifth (L5) lumbar
vertebrae and biomechanical and haemodynamic stability in patients
with a pelvic ring injury, since previous data are inconsistent. The study is a retrospective matched-pair analysis of patients
with a pelvic fracture according to the modified Tile AO Müller
and the Young and Burgess classification who presented to a level
1 trauma centre between January 2005 and December 2014.Aims
Patients and Methods
