Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) of soft-tissue is a rare melanocytic subtype of mesenchymal malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and therapeutic factors associated with increased survival, stratified by clinical stage, in order to determine the optimal treatment. The study was a retrospective analysis involving 117 patients with histologically confirmed CCS, between July 2016 and November 2017, who were enrolled in the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry in Japan.Aims
Methods
Aims. Surgery is often indicated in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) to improve pain and maximize function. Few studies are available which report on clinically meaningful outcomes such as quality of life, function, and pain relief after surgery for MBD. This is the published protocol for the Bone Metastasis Audit — Patient Reported Outcomes (BoMA-PRO) multicentre MBD study. The primary objective is to ascertain patient-reported quality of life at three to 24 months post-surgery for MBD. Methods. This will be a prospective, longitudinal study across six UK orthopaedic centres powered to identify the influence of ten patient variables on quality of life at three months after surgery for MBD. Adult patients managed for bone metastases will be screened by their treating consultant and posted out participant materials. If they opt in to participate, they will receive questionnaire packs at regular intervals from three to 24 months post-surgery and their electronic records will be screened until death or five years from recruitment. The primary outcome is quality of life as measured by the European Organisation for Research and the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ) C30 questionnaire. The protocol has been approved by the Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee (REC ref 19/NE/0303) and the study is
Objectives. As tumours of bone and soft tissue are rare, multicentre prospective collaboration is essential for meaningful research and evidence-based advances in patient care. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators encountered in large-scale collaborative research by orthopaedic oncological surgeons involved or interested in prospective multicentre collaboration. Methods. All surgeons who were involved, or had expressed an interest, in the ongoing Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial were invited to participate in a focus group to discuss their experiences with collaborative research in this area. The discussion was digitally recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The transcript was analysed qualitatively, using an analytic approach which aims to organise the data in the language of the participants with little theoretical interpretation. Results. The 13 surgeons who participated in the discussion represented orthopaedic oncology practices from seven countries (Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Spain, Denmark, United States and Canada). Four categories and associated themes emerged from the discussion: the need for collaboration in the field of orthopaedic oncology due to the rarity of the tumours and the need for high level evidence to guide treatment; motivational factors for participating in collaborative research including establishing proof of principle, learning opportunity, answering a relevant research question and being part of a collaborative research community; barriers to participation including
The aim of this study was to establish what happens to patients
in the long term after endoprosthetic replacement for a primary
malignant tumour of bone. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained
database to identify all patients who had undergone an endoprosthetic
replacement more than 25 years ago and who were still alive. Their
outcomes were investigated with reference to their complications and
need for further surgery. A total of 230 patients were identified.
Their mean age at diagnosis was 20.7 years (five to 62). The most
common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (132). The most common site was
the distal femur (102). Aims
Patients and Methods
Patients who have limb amputation for musculoskeletal
tumours are a rare group of cancer survivors. This was a prospective
cross-sectional survey of patients from five specialist centres
for sarcoma surgery in England. Physical function, pain and quality
of life (QOL) outcomes were collected after lower extremity amputation
for bone or soft-tissue tumours to evaluate the survivorship experience
and inform service provision. Of 250 patients, 105 (42%) responded between September 2012 and
June 2013. From these, completed questionnaires were received from
100 patients with a mean age of 53.6 years (19 to 91). In total
60 (62%) were male and 37 (38%) were female (three not specified).
The diagnosis was primary bone sarcoma in 63 and soft-tissue tumour
in 37. A total of 20 tumours were located in the hip or pelvis,
31 above the knee, 32 between the knee and ankle and 17 in the ankle
or foot. In total 22 had hemipelvectomy, nine hip disarticulation,
35 transfemoral amputation, one knee disarticulation, 30 transtibial
amputation, two toe amputations and one rotationplasty. The Toronto
Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) differed by amputation level, with
poorer scores at higher levels (p <
0.001). Many reported significant
pain. In addition, TESS was negatively associated with increasing
age, and pain interference scores. QOL for Cancer Survivors was
significantly correlated with TESS (p <
0.001). This relationship appeared
driven by pain interference scores. This unprecedented national survey confirms amputation level
is linked to physical function, but not QOL or pain measures. Pain
and physical function significantly impact on QOL. These results
are helpful in managing the expectations of patients about treatment
and addressing their complex needs. Cite this article:
