The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Orthopaedic departments have adopted business continuity models and guidelines for essential and non-essential surgeries to preserve hospital resources as well as protect patients and staff. These guidelines broadly encompass reduction of ambulatory care with a move towards telemedicine, redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons/residents to the frontline battle against COVID-19, continuation of education and research through web-based means, and cancellation of non-essential elective procedures. However, if containment of COVID-19 community spread is achieved, resumption of elective orthopaedic procedures and transition plans to return to normalcy must be considered for orthopaedic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic also presents a moral dilemma to the orthopaedic surgeon considering elective procedures. What is the best treatment for our patients and how does the fear of COVID-19 influence the risk-benefit discussion during a pandemic? Surgeons must deliberate the fine balance between elective surgery for a patient’s wellbeing versus risks to the operating team and utilization of precious hospital resources. Attrition of healthcare workers or Orthopaedic surgeons from restarting elective procedures prematurely or in an unsafe manner may render us ill-equipped to handle the second wave of infections. This highlights the need to develop effective screening protocols or preoperative COVID-19 testing before elective procedures in high-risk, elderly individuals with comorbidities. Alternatively, high-risk individuals should be postponed until the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection is minimal. In addition, given the higher mortality and perioperative morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing surgery, the decision to operate must be carefully deliberated. As we ramp-up elective services and get “back to business” as orthopaedic surgeons, we have to be constantly mindful to proceed in a cautious and calibrated fashion, delivering the best care, while maintaining utmost vigilance to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 during this critical transition period. Cite this article:
Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable
procedure with reproducible long-term results. Nevertheless, there
are conditions related to the type of patient or local conditions
of the knee that can make it a difficult procedure. The most common
scenarios that make it difficult are discussed in this review. These
include patients with many previous operations and incisions, and
those with severe coronal deformities, genu recurvatum, a stiff knee,
extra-articular deformities and those who have previously undergone
osteotomy around the knee and those with chronic dislocation of
the patella. Each condition is analysed according to the characteristics of
the patient, the pre-operative planning and the reported outcomes. When approaching the difficult primary TKA surgeons should use
a systematic approach, which begins with the review of the existing
literature for each specific clinical situation. Cite this article:
Intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown
to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion
after joint replacement. Recently, there has been interest in applying
it topically before the closure of surgical wounds. This has the
advantages of ease of application, maximum concentration at the
site of bleeding, minimising its systemic absorption and, consequently,
concerns about possible side-effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which included
14 randomised controlled trials (11 in knee replacement, two in
hip replacement and one in both) which investigated the effect of
topical TXA on blood loss and rates of transfusion. Topical TXA
significantly reduced the rate of blood transfusion (total knee
replacement: risk ratio (RR) 4.51; 95% confidence interval (CI):
3.02 to 6.72; p <
0.001 (nine trials, I2 = 0%); total
hip replacement: RR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.32 to 4.97, p = 0.004 (one trial)).
The rate of thromboembolic events with topical TXA were similar
to those found with a placebo. Indirect comparison of placebo-controlled
trials of topical and intravenous TXA indicates that topical administration
is superior to the intravenous route. In conclusion, topical TXA is an effective and safe method of
reducing the need for blood transfusion after total knee and hip
replacement. Further research is required to find its optimum dose
for topical use. Cite this article:
