The aims of this study were to compare the mid-term outcomes
of patients with late-stage arthritis of the wrist treated with
proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and dorsal capsular interposition
(DCI) arthroplasty with a matched cohort treated with routine PRC
alone. A total of 25 arthritic wrists (24 patients) with pre-existing
degenerative changes of the proximal capitate and/or the lunate
fossa of the radius were treated with PRC + DCI over a ten-year
period. This group of patients were matched 1:2 with a group of
50 wrists (48 patients) without degenerative changes in the capitate
or lunate fossa that were treated with a routine PRC alone during
the same period. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery
was 56.8 years (25 to 81), and the demographics and baseline range
of movement of the wrist, grip strength, Quick Disabilities of the
Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and Patient-Rated Wrist
Evaluation (PRWE) score were similar in both groups. Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment
results following arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC)
debridement for recalcitrant ulnar wrist pain. According to the
treatment algorithm, 66 patients (36 men and 30 women with a mean
age of 38.1 years (15 to 67)) with recalcitrant ulnar wrist pain
were allocated to undergo ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO; n = 24),
arthroscopic TFCC repair (n = 15), arthroscopic TFCC debridement
(n = 14) or prolonged conservative treatment (n = 13). The mean
follow-up was 36.0 months (15 to 54). Significant differences in
Hand20 score at 18 months were evident between the USO group and
TFCC debridement group (p = 0.003), and between the TFCC repair
group and TFCC debridement group (p = 0.029). Within-group comparisons showed
that Hand20 score at five months or later and pain score at two
months or later were significantly decreased in the USO/TFCC repair
groups. In contrast, scores in the TFCC debridement/conservative
groups did not decrease significantly. Grip strength at 18 months
was significantly improved in the USO/TFCC repair groups, but not
in the TFCC debridement/conservative groups. TFCC debridement shows
little benefit on the clinical course of recalcitrant ulnar wrist
pain even after excluding patients with ulnocarpal abutment or TFCC
detachment from the fovea from the indications for arthroscopic
TFCC debridement. Cite this article:
