Metal and ceramic humeral head bearing surfaces are available choices in anatomical shoulder arthroplasties. Wear studies have shown superior performance of ceramic heads, however comparison of clinical outcomes according to bearing surface in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) is limited. This study aimed to compare the rates of revision and reoperation following metal and ceramic humeral head TSA and HA using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR), which collects data from England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey. NJR shoulder arthroplasty records were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and the National Mortality Register. TSA and HA performed for osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with an intact rotator cuff were included. Metal and ceramic humeral head prostheses were matched within separate TSA and HA groups using propensity scores based on 12 and 11 characteristics, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first revision and the secondary outcome was non-revision reoperation.Aims
Methods
There are concerns regarding complications and longevity of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in young patients, and the few previous publications are mainly limited to reports on linked elbow devices. We investigated the clinical outcome of unlinked TEA for patients aged less than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 elbows of 21 patients with RA who were aged less than 50 years who underwent primary TEA with an unlinked elbow prosthesis. The mean patient age was 46 years (35 to 49), and the mean follow-up period was 13.6 years (6 to 27). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiological evaluation for radiolucent line and loosening, complications, and revision surgery with or without implant removal.Aims
Methods
Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging for upper limb surgeons. Open elbow arthrolysis is commonly used for the treatment of stiff elbow when conservative therapy has failed. Multiple questions commonly arise from surgeons who deal with this disease. These include whether the patient has post-traumatic stiff elbow, how to evaluate the problem, when surgery is appropriate, how to perform an excellent arthrolysis, what the optimal postoperative rehabilitation is, and how to prevent or reduce the incidence of complications. Following these questions, this review provides an update and overview of post-traumatic elbow stiffness with respect to the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, arthrolysis strategies, postoperative rehabilitation, and prevention of complications, aiming to provide a complete diagnosis and treatment path. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to report the mid-term clinical outcome
of cemented unlinked J-alumina ceramic elbow (JACE) arthroplasties
when used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We retrospectively reviewed 87 elbows, in 75 patients with RA,
which was replaced using a cemented JACE total elbow arthroplasty
(TEA) between August 2003 and December 2012, with a follow-up of
96%. There were 72 women and three men, with a mean age of 62 years
(35 to 79). The mean follow-up was nine years (2 to 14). The clinical condition
of each elbow before and after surgery was assessed using the Mayo
Elbow Performance Index (MEPI, 0 to 100 points). Radiographic loosening
was defined as a progressive radiolucent line of >1 mm that was
completely circumferential around the prosthesis.Aims
Patients and Methods
We assessed the long-term (more than ten-year) outcomes of the
Kudo type-5 elbow prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
(RA). We reviewed 41 elbows (Larsen Grade IV, n = 21; Grade V, n =
20) in 31 patients with RA who had undergone a Kudo type-5 total
elbow arthroplasty (TEA) between 1994 and 2003, and had been followed
up for more than ten years. The humeral component was cementless
and the all-polyethylene ulnar component cemented in every patient. Clinical
outcome was assessed using the Mayo elbow performance score. We
calculated the revision rate and evaluated potential risk factors
for revision. The duration of follow-up was a mean 141 months (120
to 203).Aims
Materials and Methods
We describe the use of a protocol of irrigation and debridement
(I&
D) with retention of the implant for the treatment of periprosthetic
infection of a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). This may be an attractive
alternative to staged re-implantation. Between 1990 and 2010, 23 consecutive patients were treated in
this way. Three were lost to follow-up leaving 20 patients (21 TEAs)
in the study. There were six men and 14 women. Their mean age was
58 years (23 to 76). The protocol involved: component unlinking,
irrigation and debridement (I&
D), and the introduction of antibiotic
laden cement beads; organism-specific intravenous antibiotics; repeat
I&
D and re-linkage of the implant if appropriate; long-term
oral antibiotic therapy. Aims
Patients and Methods
Our aim was to compare the outcome of arthroscopic
release for frozen shoulder in patients with and without diabetes.
We prospectively compared the outcome in 21 patients with and 21
patients without diabetes, two years post-operatively. The modified
Constant score was used as the outcome measure. The mean age of
the patients was 54.5 years (48 to 65; male:female ratio: 18:24),
the mean pre-operative duration of symptoms was 8.3 months (6 to
13) and the mean pre-operative modified Constant scores were 36.6
(standard deviation ( Cite this article:
In this study, we evaluated patient-reported
outcomes, the rate of revision and the indications for revision
following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in patients
with osteoarthritis. All patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary resurfacing
hemiarthroplasty and reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty
Registry (DSR), between January 2006 and December 2010 were included.
There were 772 patients (837 arthroplasties) in the study. The Western
Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index was used to
evaluate patient-reported outcome 12 months (10 to 14) post-operatively.
The rates of revision were calculated from the revisions reported
to the DSR up to December 2011 and by checking deaths with the Danish National
Register of Persons. A complete questionnaire was returned by 688 patients (82.2%).
The mean WOOS was 67 (0 to 100). A total of 63 hemiarthroplasties
(7.5%) required revision; the cumulative five-year rate of revision
was 9.9%. Patients aged <
55 years had a statistically significant
inferior WOOS score, which exceeded the minimal clinically important
difference, compared with older patients (mean difference 14.2 (8.8;
95% CI 19.6; p <
0.001), but with no increased risk of revision.
There was no significant difference in the mean WOOS or the risk
of revision between designs of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty. Cite this article:
We retrospectively assessed the value of identifying
impinging osteophytes using dynamic computer simulation of CT scans
of the elbow in assisting their arthroscopic removal in patients
with osteoarthritis of the elbow. A total of 20 patients were treated
(19 men and one woman, mean age 38 years (19 to 55)) and followed
for a mean of 25 months (24 to 29). We located the impinging osteophytes
dynamically using computerised three-dimensional models of the elbow
based on CT data in three positions of flexion of the elbow. These
were then removed arthroscopically and a capsular release was performed. The mean loss of extension improved from 23° (10° to 45°) pre-operatively
to 9° (0° to 25°) post-operatively, and the mean flexion improved
from 121° (80° to 140°) pre-operatively to 130° (110° to 145°) post-operatively.
The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved from 62 (30 to 85)
to 95 (70 to 100) post-operatively. All patients had pain in the
elbow pre-operatively which disappeared or decreased post-operatively.
According to their Mayo scores, 14 patients had an excellent clinical
outcome and six a good outcome; 15 were very satisfied and five
were satisfied with their post-operative outcome. We recommend this technique in the surgical management of patients
with osteoarthritis of the elbow. Cite this article:
