The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients to a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing corticosteroid injection (CSI) to autologous protein solution (APS) injection for the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain in a community care setting. The study focused on recruitment rates and retention of participants throughout, and collected data on the interventions’ safety and efficacy. Participants were recruited from two community musculoskeletal treatment centres in the UK. Patients were eligible if aged 18 years or older, and had a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome which the treating clinician thought was suitable for treatment with a subacromial injection. Consenting patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to a patient-blinded subacromial injection of CSI (standard care) or APS. The primary outcome measures of this study relate to rates of recruitment, retention, and compliance with intervention and follow-up to determine feasibility. Secondary outcome measures relate to the safety and efficacy of the interventions.Aims
Methods
We conducted a study to identify factors that are prognostic
of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for calcific
tendinitis of the shoulder. Since 1998, patients with symptomatic calcific tendinitis of
the rotator cuff have been treated with ESWT using an electrohydraulic
mode shockwave device. One year after ESWT, patients were grouped
according to the level of resorption of calcification.Aims
Patients and Methods
The appropriate management for patients with a degenerative tear
of the rotator cuff remains controversial, but operative treatment,
particularly arthroscopic surgery, is increasingly being used. Our
aim in this paper was to compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic
with open repair of the rotator cuff. A total of 273 patients were recruited to a randomised comparison
trial (136 to arthroscopic surgery and 137 to open surgery) from
19 teaching and general hospitals in the United Kingdom. The surgeons
used their usual preferred method of repair. The Oxford Shoulder
Score (OSS), two years post-operatively, was the primary outcome
measure. Imaging of the shoulder was performed at one year after
surgery. The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials,
ISRCTN97804283.Aims
Patients and Methods
The ageing population and an increase in both
the incidence and prevalence of cancer pose a healthcare challenge, some
of which is borne by the orthopaedic community in the form of osteoporotic
fractures and metastatic bone disease. In recent years there has
been an increasing understanding of the pathways involved in bone
metabolism relevant to osteoporosis and metastases in bone. Newer
therapies may aid the management of these problems. One group of
drugs, the antibody mediated anti-resorptive therapies (AMARTs)
use antibodies to block bone resorption pathways. This review seeks
to present a synopsis of the guidelines, pharmacology and potential pathophysiology
of AMARTs and other new anti-resorptive drugs. We evaluate the literature relating to AMARTs and new anti-resorptives
with special attention on those approved for use in clinical practice. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against Receptor Activator for
Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand. It is the first AMART approved by
the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the
US Food and Drug Administration. Other novel anti-resorptives awaiting
approval for clinical use include Odanacatib. Denosumab is indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis and
prevention of the complications of bone metastases. Recent evidence
suggests, however, that denosumab may have an adverse event profile
similar to bisphosphonates, including atypical femoral fractures.
It is, therefore, essential that orthopaedic surgeons are conversant
with these medications and their safe usage. Take home message: Denosumab has important orthopaedic indications
and has been shown to significantly reduce patient morbidity in
osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease. Cite this article:
