Objectives. To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal
fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between
two different models of a single implant type. Methods. A total of 136 patients who received either a 2.4 mm (n = 61)
or 3.5 mm (n = 75) distal radius locking compression plate (LCP
DR) using a volar approach were followed over two years. The main
outcome measurements included motion, grip strength, pain, and the
scores of Gartland and Werley, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Differences
between the treatment groups were evaluated using regression analysis
and the likelihood ratio test with significance based on the Bonferroni
corrected p-value of <
0.003. Results. The groups were similar with respect to baseline and injury characteristics
as well as general surgical details. The risk of experiencing a
complication after ORIF with a LCP DR 2.4 mm was 18% (n = 11) compared
with 11% (n = 8) after receiving a LCP DR 3.5 mm (p = 0.45). Wrist
function was also similar between the cohorts based on the mean ranges
of movement (all p >
0.052) and grip
