Pelvic reconstruction after the resection of a tumour around
the acetabulum is a challenging procedure due to the complex anatomy
and biomechanics. Several pelvic endoprostheses have been introduced,
but the rates of complication remain high. Our aim was to review
the use of a stemmed acetabular pedestal cup in the management of
these patients. The study involved 48 patients who underwent periacetabular reconstruction
using a stemmed pedestal cup (Schoellner cup; Zimmer Biomet Inc.,
Warsaw, Indiana) between 2000 and 2013. The indications for treatment included
a primary bone tumour in 27 patients and metastatic disease in 21
patients. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was
52 years (16 to 83).Aims
Patients and Methods
Peri-acetabular tumour resections and their subsequent
reconstruction are among the most challenging procedures in orthopaedic
oncology. Despite the fact that a number of different pelvic endoprostheses
have been introduced, rates of complication remain high and long-term
results are mostly lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome
of reconstructing a peri-acetabular defect with a pedestal cup endoprosthesis
after a type 2 or type 2/3 internal hemipelvectomy. A total of 19 patients (11M:8F) with a mean age of 48 years (14
to 72) were included, most of whom had been treated for a primary
bone tumour (n = 16) between 2003 and 2009. After a mean follow-up
of 39 months (28 days to 8.7 years) seven patients had died. After
a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (4.3 to 10.5), 12 patients were alive,
of whom 11 were disease-free. Complications occurred in 15 patients.
Three had recurrent dislocations and three experienced aseptic loosening.
There were no mechanical failures. Infection occurred in nine patients,
six of whom required removal of the prosthesis. Two patients underwent
hindquarter amputation for local recurrence. The implant survival rate at five years was 50% for all reasons,
and 61% for non-oncological reasons. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor
Society score at final follow-up was 49% (13 to 87). Based on these poor results, we advise caution if using the pedestal
cup for reconstruction of a peri-acetabular tumour resection. Cite this article:
We reviewed the outcome of patients who had been
treated operatively for symptomatic peri-acetabular metastases and
present an algorithm to guide treatment. . The records of 81 patients who had been treated operatively for
symptomatic peri-acetabular metastases between 1987 and 2010 were
identified. There were 27 men and 54 women with a mean age of 61
years (15 to 87). The diagnosis, size of lesion, degree of pelvic
continuity, type of reconstruction, World Health Organization performance
status, survival time, pain, mobility and complications including
implant failure were recorded in each case. The overall patient survivorship at five years was 5%. The longest
lived patient survived 16 years from the date of diagnosis. The
mean survival was 23 months (<
1 to 16 years) and the median
was 15 months. At follow-up 14 patients remained alive. Two cementoplasties
failed because of local disease progression. Three Harrington rods broke:
one patient needed a subsequent Girdlestone procedure. One ‘ice-cream
cone’ prosthesis dislocated and was subsequently revised without
further problems. We recommend the ‘ice-cream cone’ for pelvic discontinuity
and Harrington rod reconstruction for severe bone loss. Smaller
defects can be safely managed using standard