Metal and ceramic humeral head bearing surfaces are available choices in anatomical shoulder arthroplasties. Wear studies have shown superior performance of ceramic heads, however comparison of clinical outcomes according to bearing surface in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) is limited. This study aimed to compare the rates of revision and reoperation following metal and ceramic humeral head TSA and HA using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR), which collects data from England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey. NJR shoulder arthroplasty records were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and the National Mortality Register. TSA and HA performed for osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with an intact rotator cuff were included. Metal and ceramic humeral head prostheses were matched within separate TSA and HA groups using propensity scores based on 12 and 11 characteristics, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first revision and the secondary outcome was non-revision reoperation.Aims
Methods
The main objective of this study was to examine whether the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) demonstrated floor or ceiling effects when used to measure outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty in a large national cohort. Secondary objectives were to assess its pain and function subscales, and to identify independent predictors for patients achieving a postoperative ceiling score following shoulder arthroplasty. Secondary database analysis of the National Joint Registry (NJR), which included 48,270 patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, was conducted. The primary outcome measure was the OSS. Secondary outcome measures were the OSS-Function Component Subscale and OSS-Pain Component Subscale. Floor and ceiling effects were considered to be present if > 15% of patients scored either the lowest or highest possible score. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for scoring the highest possible OSS score postoperatively.Aims
Methods
Aims. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of two radiocapitellar prostheses in a large case series followed prospectively, with medium-term follow-up. Patients and Methods. A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 54 years (27 to 73) were analyzed; nine had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and 17 had post-traumatic OA, three had capitellar osteonecrosis, and two had a fracture. Overall, 17 Lateral
The aim of this study was to use national registry database information to estimate cumulative rates and relative risk of revision due to infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We included 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties recorded between 2004 and 2013 in The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) data set. With the Kaplan–Meier method, we illustrated the ten-year cumulative rates of revision due to infection and with the Cox regression model, we reported the hazard ratios as a measure of the relative risk of revision due to infection.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcome and
implant survival of the lateral resurfacing elbow (LRE) arthroplasty
in the treatment of elbow arthritis. We reviewed a consecutive series of 27 patients (30 elbows) who
underwent LRE arthroplasty between December 2005 and January 2008.
There were 15 women and 12 men, with a mean age of 61 years (25
to 82). The diagnosis was primary hypotrophic osteoarthritis (OA)
in 12 patients (14 elbows), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA)
in five (five elbows) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in ten patients
(11 elbows). The mean clinical outcome scores including the Mayo
Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the American Shoulder and Elbow
Surgeons elbow score (ASES-e), the mean range of movement and the
radiological outcome were recorded at three, six and 12 months and
at a mean final follow-up of 8.3 years (7.3 to 9.4). A one sample Aim
Patients and Methods
Currently, there is little information about the need for peri-operative
blood transfusion in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of transfusion
and its predisposing factors, and to establish a blood conservation
strategy. We identified all patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty
at our hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. The
rate of transfusion was determined from the patient’s records. While
there were exceptions, patients typically underwent transfusion
if they had a level of haemoglobin of <
7.5 g/dl if asymptomatic,
<
9.0 g/dl if they had a significant cardiac history or symptoms
of dizziness or light headedness. Multivariable regression analysis was undertaken to identify
predictors of transfusion. High- and low-risk cohorts for transfusion
were identified from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Aims
Methods
In this study, we evaluated patient-reported
outcomes, the rate of revision and the indications for revision
following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in patients
with osteoarthritis. All patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary resurfacing
hemiarthroplasty and reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty
Registry (DSR), between January 2006 and December 2010 were included.
There were 772 patients (837 arthroplasties) in the study. The Western
Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index was used to
evaluate patient-reported outcome 12 months (10 to 14) post-operatively.
The rates of revision were calculated from the revisions reported
to the DSR up to December 2011 and by checking deaths with the Danish National
Register of Persons. A complete questionnaire was returned by 688 patients (82.2%).
The mean WOOS was 67 (0 to 100). A total of 63 hemiarthroplasties
(7.5%) required revision; the cumulative five-year rate of revision
was 9.9%. Patients aged <
55 years had a statistically significant
inferior WOOS score, which exceeded the minimal clinically important
difference, compared with older patients (mean difference 14.2 (8.8;
95% CI 19.6; p <
0.001), but with no increased risk of revision.
There was no significant difference in the mean WOOS or the risk
of revision between designs of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty. Cite this article:
