Traditionally, total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating has been performed on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Recently, additional AP hip radiographs have been recommended for accurate measurement of the femoral offset (FO). To verify this claim, this study aimed to establish quantitative data of the measurement error of the FO in relation to leg position and X-ray source position using a newly developed geometric model and clinical data. We analyzed the FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs in a prospective consecutive series of 55 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA for hip osteoarthritis. To determine sample size, a power analysis was performed. Patients’ position and X-ray beam setting followed a standardized protocol to achieve reproducible projections. All images were calibrated with the KingMark calibration system. In addition, a geometric model was created to evaluate both the effects of leg position (rotation and abduction/adduction) and the effects of X-ray source position on FO measurement.Aims
Methods
The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes. A retrospective institutional review board-approved observational study was performed with 333 symptomatic patients (384 hips) with hip pain due to FAI evaluated for hip preservation surgery. Overall, 142 patients (165 hips) had cam-type FAI, while 118 patients (137 hips) had mixed-type FAI. The allocation to each subgroup was based on reference values calculated on anteroposterior radiographs. CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and AV were retrospectively compared among five FAI subgroups. Frequency of decreased FV < 10°, severely decreased FV < 5°, and absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was analyzed.Aims
Methods
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement with robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The study analyzed a consecutive series of 69 patients who underwent robotic-arm assisted THA between September 2018 and December 2019. Of these, 30 patients had DDH and were classified according to the Crowe type. Acetabular component alignment and 3D positions were measured using pre- and postoperative CT data. The absolute differences of cup alignment and 3D position were compared between DDH and non-DDH patients. Moreover, these differences were analyzed in relation to the severity of DDH. The discrepancy of leg length and combined offset compared with contralateral hip were measured.Aims
Methods
Some patients presenting with hip pain and instability and underlying acetabular dysplasia (AD) do not experience resolution of symptoms after surgical management. Hip-spine syndrome is a possible underlying cause. We hypothesized that there is a higher frequency of radiological spine anomalies in patients with AD. We also assessed the relationship between radiological severity of AD and frequency of spine anomalies. In a retrospective analysis of registry data, 122 hips in 122 patients who presented with hip pain and and a final diagnosis of AD were studied. Two observers analyzed hip and spine variables using standard radiographs to assess AD. The frequency of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV), along with associated Castellvi grade, pars interarticularis defect, and spinal morphological measurements were recorded and correlated with radiological severity of AD.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to radiologically evaluate the quality of cement mantle and alignment achieved with a polished tapered cemented femoral stem inserted through the anterior approach and compared with the posterior approach. A comparative retrospective study of 115 consecutive hybrid total hip arthroplasties or cemented hemiarthroplasties in 110 patients, performed through anterior (n = 58) or posterior approach (n = 57) using a collarless polished taper-slip femoral stem, was conducted. Cement mantle quality and thickness were assessed in both planes. Radiological outcomes were compared between groups.Aims
Methods
Cross-table lateral (CTL) radiographs are commonly used to measure acetabular component anteversion after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The CTL measurements may differ by > 10° from CT scan measurements but the reasons for this discrepancy are poorly understood. Anteversion measurements from CTL radiographs and CT scans are compared to identify spinopelvic parameters predictive of inaccuracy. THA patients (n = 47; 27 males, 20 females; mean age 62.9 years (SD 6.95)) with preoperative spinopelvic mobility, radiological analysis, and postoperative CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. Acetabular component anteversion was measured on postoperative CTL radiographs and CT scans using 3D reconstructions of the pelvis. Two cohorts were identified based on a CTL-CT error of ≥ 10° (n = 11) or < 10° (n = 36). Spinopelvic mobility parameters were compared using independent-samples Aims
Methods
Appropriate acetabular component placement has been proposed for prevention of postoperative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Manual placements often cause outliers in spite of attempts to insert the component within the intended safe zone; therefore, some surgeons routinely evaluate intraoperative pelvic radiographs to exclude excessive acetabular component malposition. However, their evaluation is often ambiguous in case of the tilted or rotated pelvic position. The purpose of this study was to develop the computational analysis to digitalize the acetabular component orientation regardless of the pelvic tilt or rotation. Intraoperative pelvic radiographs of 50 patients who underwent THA were collected retrospectively. The 3D pelvic bone model and the acetabular component were image-matched to the intraoperative pelvic radiograph. The radiological anteversion (RA) and radiological inclination (RI) of the acetabular component were calculated and those measurement errors from the postoperative CT data were compared relative to those of the 2D measurements. In addition, the intra- and interobserver differences of the image-matching analysis were evaluated.Aims
Methods
The aim of the current study was to assess the reliability of the Ottawa classification for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia. In all, 134 consecutive hips that underwent periacetabular osteotomy were categorized using a validated software (Hip2Norm) into four categories of normal, lateral/global, anterior, or posterior. A total of 74 cases were selected for reliability analysis, and these included 44 dysplastic and 30 normal hips. A group of six blinded fellowship-trained raters, provided with the classification system, looked at these radiographs at two separate timepoints to classify the hips using standard radiological measurements. Thereafter, a consensus meeting was held where a modified flow diagram was devised, before a third reading by four raters using a separate set of 74 radiographs took place.Aims
Methods
Several radiological methods of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been described. These are limited by low reproducibility, are less accurate than CT 3D reconstruction, and are cumbersome to use. These methods also partly rely on the identification of obscured radiological borders of the component. We propose two novel methods, the Area and Orthogonal methods, which have been designed to maximize use of readily identifiable points while maintaining the same trigonometric principles. A retrospective study of plain radiographs was conducted on 160 hips of 141 patients who had undergone primary THA. We compared the reliability and accuracy of the Area and Orthogonal methods with two of the current leading methods: those of Widmer and Lewinnek, respectively.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip aimed to: 1) characterize the contribution of the hip, spinopelvic complex, and lumbar spine when moving from the standing to the sitting position; 2) assess whether abnormal spinopelvic mobility is associated with worse symptoms; and 3) identify whether spinopelvic mobility can be predicted from static anatomical radiological parameters. A total of 122 patients with end-stage OA of the hip awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) were prospectively studied. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Oxford Hip Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Score) and clinical data were collected. Sagittal spinopelvic mobility was calculated as the change from the standing to sitting position using the lumbar lordosis angle (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic-femoral angle (PFA), and acetabular anteinclination (AI) from lateral radiographs. The interaction of the different parameters was assessed. PROMs were compared between patients with normal spinopelvic mobility (10° ≤ ∆PT ≤ 30°) or abnormal spinopelvic mobility (stiff: ∆PT < ± 10°; hypermobile: ∆PT > ± 30°). Multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to test for possible predictors of spinopelvic mobility.Aims
Patients and Methods
Few reconstructive techniques are available for patients requiring
complex acetabular revisions such as those involving Paprosky type
2C, 3A and 3B deficiencies and pelvic discontinuity. Our aim was
to describe the development of the patient specific Triflange acetabular
component for use in these patients, the surgical technique and
mid-term results. We include a description of the pre-operative
CT scanning, the construction of a model, operative planning, and
surgical technique. All implants were coated with porous plasma
spray and hydroxyapatite if desired. A multicentre, retrospective review of 95 complex acetabular
reconstructions in 94 patients was performed. A total of 61 (64.2%)
were female. The mean age of the patients was 66 (38 to 85). The
mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2 (18 to 51). Outcome
was reported using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), complications, failures
and survival.Aims
Patients and Methods
This paper describes the methodology, validation and reliability
of a new computer-assisted method which uses models of the patient’s
bones and the components to measure their migration and polyethylene
wear from radiographs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Models of the patient’s acetabular and femoral component obtained
from the manufacturer and models of the patient’s pelvis and femur
built from a single computed tomography (CT) scan, are used by a
computer program to measure the migration of the components and
the penetration of the femoral head from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs
taken at follow-up visits. The program simulates the radiographic
setup and matches the position and orientation of the models to
outlines of the pelvis, the acetabular and femoral component, and
femur on radiographs. Changes in position and orientation reflect
the migration of the components and the penetration of the femoral
head. Validation was performed using radiographs of phantoms simulating
known migration and penetration, and the clinical feasibility of
measuring migration was assessed in two patients.Aims
Materials and Methods
Femoral stem version has a major influence on
impingement and early post-operative stability after total hip arthroplasty
(THA). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the validity
of a novel radiological method for measuring stem version. Anteroposterior
(AP) radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans were obtained for
115 patients (female/male 63/72, mean age 62.5 years (50 to 75))
who had undergone minimally invasive, cementless THA. Stem version was
calculated from the AP hip radiograph by rotation-based change in
the projected prosthetic neck–shaft (NSA*) angle using the mathematical
formula ST = arcos [tan (NSA*) / tan (135)]. We used two independent
observers who repeated the analysis after a six-week interval. Radiological
measurements were compared with 3D-CT measurements by an independent,
blinded external institute. We found a mean difference of 1.2° ( We found that femoral tilt was associated with the mean radiological
measurement error (r = 0.22, p = 0.02). The projected neck–shaft angle is a reliable method for measuring
stem version on AP radiographs of the hip after a THA. However,
a highly standardised radiological technique is required for its
precise measurement. Cite this article:
The cam-type deformity in femoroacetabular impingement
is a 3D deformity. Single measurements using radiographs, CT or
MRI may not provide a true estimate of the magnitude of the deformity.
We performed an analysis of the size and location of measurements
of the alpha angle (α°) using a CT technique which could be applied
to the 3D reconstructions of the hip. Analysis was undertaken in
42 patients (57 hips; 24 men and 18 women; mean age 38 years (16
to 58)) who had symptoms of femoroacetabular impingement related
to a cam-type abnormality. An α° of >
50° was considered a significant
indicator of cam-type impingement. Measurements of the α° were made
at different points around the femoral head/neck junction at intervals
of 30°: starting at the nine o’clock (posterior), ten, eleven and
twelve o’clock (superior), one, two and ending at three o’clock
(anterior) position. The mean maximum increased α° was 64.6° (50.8° to 86°). The two
o’clock position was the most common point to find an increased α°
(53 hips; 93%), followed by one o’clock (48 hips; 84%). The largest α°
for each hip was found most frequently at the two o’clock position
(46%), followed by the one o’clock position (39%). Generally, raised α angles
extend over three segments of the clock face. Single measurements of the α°, whether pre- or post-operative,
should be viewed with caution as they may not be representative
of the true size of the deformity and not define whether adequate
correction has been achieved following surgery. Cite this article:
To study the vascularity and bone metabolism of the femoral head/neck
following hip resurfacing arthroplasty, and to use these results
to compare the posterior and the trochanteric-flip approaches. In our previous work, we reported changes to intra-operative
blood flow during hip resurfacing arthroplasty comparing two surgical
approaches. In this study, we report the vascularity and the metabolic
bone function in the proximal femur in these same patients at one
year after the surgery. Vascularity and bone function was assessed
using scintigraphic techniques. Of the 13 patients who agreed to
take part, eight had their arthroplasty through a posterior approach
and five through a trochanteric-flip approach.Objectives
Methods
In the majority of patients with slipped upper
femoral epiphysis only one hip is involved at primary diagnosis. However,
the contralateral hip often becomes involved over time. There are
no reliable factors predicting a contralateral slip. Whether or
not the contralateral hip should undergo prophylactic fixation is
a matter of controversy. We present a number of essential points
that have to be considered both when choosing to fix the contralateral
hip prophylactically as well as when refraining from surgery and
instead following the patients with repeat radiographs.
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was
to identify any difference in femoral offset as measured on pre-operative
anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the pelvis, AP radiographs of
the hip and corresponding CT scans in a consecutive series of 100
patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip (43 men
and 57 women with a mean age of 61 years (45 to 74) and a mean body
mass index of 28 kg/m2 (20 to 45)). Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol
to achieve reproducible projection and all images were calibrated.
Inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated and agreement
between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. In the entire cohort, the mean femoral offset was 39.0 mm (95%
confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 40.6) on radiographs of the pelvis,
44.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 45.6) on radiographs of the hip and 44.7
mm (95% CI 43.5 to 45.9) on CT scans. AP radiographs of the pelvis
underestimated femoral offset by 13% when compared with CT (p <
0.001).
No difference in mean femoral offset was seen between AP radiographs
of the hip and CT (p = 0.191). Our results suggest that femoral offset is significantly underestimated
on AP radiographs of the pelvis but can be reliably and accurately
assessed on AP radiographs of the hip in patients with primary end-stage
hip osteoarthritis. We, therefore, recommend that additional AP radiographs of the
hip are obtained routinely for the pre-operative assessment of femoral
offset when templating before total hip replacement.
Hip arthroscopy is particularly attractive in
children as it confers advantages over arthrotomy or open surgery,
such as shorter recovery time and earlier return to activity. Developments
in surgical technique and arthroscopic instrumentation have enabled
extension of arthroscopy of the hip to this age group. Potential
challenges in paediatric and adolescent hip arthroscopy include
variability in size, normal developmental change from childhood to
adolescence, and conditions specific to children and adolescents
and their various consequences. Treatable disorders include the
sequelae of traumatic and sports-related hip joint injuries, Legg–Calve–Perthes’
disease and slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and the arthritic
and septic hip. Intra-articular abnormalities are rarely isolated and
are often associated with underlying morphological changes. This review presents the current concepts of hip arthroscopy
in the paediatric and adolescent patient, covering clinical assessment
and investigation, indications and results of the experience to
date, as well as technical challenges and future directions.
This study examined the relationship between the cross-over sign and the true three-dimensional anatomical version of the acetabulum. We also investigated whether in true retroversion there is excessive femoral head cover anteriorly. Radiographs of 64 hips in patients being investigated for symptoms of femoro-acetabular impingement were analysed and the presence of a cross-over sign was documented. CT scans of the same hips were analysed to determine anatomical version and femoral head cover in relation to the anterior pelvic plane after correcting for pelvic tilt. The sensitivity and specificity of the cross-over sign were 92% and 55%, respectively for identifying true acetabular retroversion. There was no significant difference in total cover between normal and retroverted cases. Anterior and posterior cover were, however, significantly different (p <
0.001 and 0.002). The cross-over sign was found to be sensitive but not specific. The results for femoral head cover suggest that retroversion is characterised by posterior deficiency but increased cover anteriorly.
Digital templating in hip replacement is commonly performed with radiological markers to determine the magnification. The latter can also be determined by measuring the distance from the x-ray focal spot to the object and the distance from the x-ray focal spot to the radiological cassette or image receptor. We used post-operative radiographs of total hip replacements and hemiarthroplasties from 22 patients to calculate the magnification using both methods. The accuracy of each method was ascertained by measuring the size of the head of the implant projected on to the radiographs and comparing the result with the known size recorded in the medical records. The accuracy was found to be similar with a mean absolute measurement error of 2.6% ( We conclude that the distance measuring method is as accurate as the radiological marker method, but may avoid some of the disadvantages such as misplacement of the marker or placement outside the radiological field. It may also be more acceptable to the patient and radiographer.
