The aim of this study was to evaluate whether achieving medial joint opening, as measured by the change in the joint line convergence angle (∆JLCA), is a better predictor of clinical outcomes after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared with the mechanical axis deviation, and to find individualized targets for the redistribution of load that reflect bony alignment, joint laxity, and surgical technique. This retrospective study analyzed 121 knees in 101 patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively, and were analyzed according to the surgical technique (opening or closing wedge), postoperative mechanical axis deviation (deviations above and below 10% from the target), and achievement of medial joint opening (∆JLCA > 1°). Radiological parameters, including JLCA, mechanical axis deviation, and the difference in JLCA between preoperative standing and supine radiographs (JLCAPD), an indicator of medial soft-tissue laxity, were measured. Cut-off points for parameters related to achieving medial joint opening were calculated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Aims
Methods
A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis. Overall, 50 subjects were randomized (21 EF-TKA and 23 Std-TKA in the final analysis), and had follow-up visits at six weeks, and six, 12, and 24 months to assess migration of the tibial component. Low viscosity bone cement with tobramycin was used in a standardized fashion for all subjects. Patient-reported outcome measure data was captured at preoperative and all postoperative visits.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the radiological outcomes of manual versus robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Postoperative radiological outcomes from 86 consecutive robotic-assisted UKAs (RAUKA group) from a single academic centre were retrospectively reviewed and compared to 253 manual UKAs (MUKA group) drawn from a prior study at our institution. Femoral coronal and sagittal angles (FCA, FSA), tibial coronal and sagittal angles (TCA, TSA), and implant overhang were radiologically measured to identify outliers.Aims
Methods
Total knee arthroplasty is an established treatment for knee osteoarthritis with excellent long-term results, but there remains controversy about the role of uncemented prostheses. We present the long-term results of a randomized trial comparing an uncemented tantalum metal tibial component with a conventional cemented component of the same implant design. Patients under the age of 70 years with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized to receive either an uncemented tantalum metal tibial monoblock component or a standard cemented modular component. The mean age at time of recruitment to the study was 63 years (50 to 70), 46 (51.1%) knees were in male patients, and the mean body mass index was 30.4 kg/m2 (21 to 36). The same cruciate retaining total knee system was used in both groups. All patients received an uncemented femoral component and no patients had their patella resurfaced. Patient outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the modified Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12) score. Radiographs were analyzed using the American Knee Society Radiograph Evaluation score. Operative complications, reoperations, or revision surgery were recorded. A total of 90 knees were randomized and at last review 77 knees were assessed. In all, 11 patients had died and two were lost to follow-up.Aims
Methods
A significant percentage of patients remain dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation for femoral component preparation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improved complication rates, radiological alignment, or patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with a historical control group using conventional instrumentation. This retrospective cohort study included 371 TKAs performed by a single surgeon sequentially. A historical control group, with the use of intramedullary guides for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided ligament balancing, was compared with a group using accelerometer-based navigation for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided balancing (group 1), and one using navigated femoral resection and sensor-guided balancing (group 2). Primary outcome measures were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) scores measured preoperatively and at six weeks and 12 months postoperatively. The position of the components and the mechanical axis of the limb were measured postoperatively. The postoperative range of motion (ROM), haematocrit change, and complications were also recorded.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of using a
portable, accelerometer-based surgical navigation system (KneeAlign2)
in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the alignment of the femoral
component, and blood loss. A total of 241 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthritis
of the knee were enrolled in this prospective, randomised controlled
study. There were 207 women and 34 men. The mean age of the patients
was 74.0 years (57 to 89). The KneeAlign2 system was used for distal
femoral resection in 121 patients (KA2 group) and a conventional intramedullary
femoral guide was used in 120 patients (IM group).Aims
Patients and Methods
This prospective randomised controlled trial was designed to
evaluate the outcome of both the MRI- and CT-based patient-specific
matched guides (PSG) from the same manufacturer. A total of 137 knees in 137 patients (50 men, 87 women) were
included, 67 in the MRI- and 70 in the CT-based PSG group. Their
mean age was 68.4 years (47.0 to 88.9). Outcome was expressed as
the biomechanical limb alignment (centre hip-knee-ankle: HKA-axis)
achieved post-operatively, the position of the individual components
within 3° of the pre-operatively planned alignment, correct planned
implant size and operative data (e.g. operating time and blood loss).Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study we randomised 140 patients who
were due to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to have the
procedure performed using either patient-specific cutting guides
(PSCG) or conventional instrumentation (CI). . The primary outcome measure was the mechanical axis, as measured
at three months on a standing long-leg radiograph by the hip–knee–ankle
(HKA) angle. This was undertaken by an independent observer who
was blinded to the instrumentation. Secondary outcome measures were
component positioning, operating time, Knee Society and Oxford knee
scores, blood loss and length of hospital stay. A total of 126 patients (67 in the CI group and 59 in the PSCG
group) had complete clinical and radiological data. There were 88
females and 52 males with a mean age of 69.3 years (47 to 84) and
a mean BMI of 28.6 kg/m. 2. (20.2 to 40.8). The mean HKA
angle was 178.9° (172.5 to 183.4) in the CI group and 178.2° (172.4
to 183.4) in the PSCG group (p = 0.34).
We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing
computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with conventional surgery (CONV)
in total knee replacement (TKR). Between 2009 and 2011 a total of
192 patients with a mean age of 68 years (55 to 85) with osteoarthritis
or arthritic disease of the knee were recruited from four Norwegian
hospitals. At three months follow-up, functional results were marginally
better for the CAS group. Mean differences (MD) in favour of CAS
were found for the Knee Society function score (MD: 5.9, 95% confidence
interval (CI) 0.3 to 11.4, p = 0.039), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales for ‘pain’ (MD: 7.7, 95% CI 1.7 to
13.6, p = 0.012), ‘sports’ (MD: 13.5, 95% CI 5.6 to 21.4, p = 0.001)
and ‘quality of life’ (MD: 7.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 14.3, p = 0.046).
At one-year follow-up, differences favouring CAS were found for
KOOS ‘sports’ (MD: 11.0, 95% CI 3.0 to 19.0, p = 0.007) and KOOS
‘symptoms’ (MD: 6.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 13.0, p = 0.035). The use of
CAS resulted in fewer outliers in frontal alignment (>
3° malalignment),
both for the entire TKR (37.9% Cite this article:
Minimally invasive total knee replacement (MIS-TKR)
has been reported to have better early recovery than conventional
TKR. Quadriceps-sparing (QS) TKR is the least invasive MIS procedure,
but it is technically demanding with higher reported rates of complications
and outliers. This study was designed to compare the early clinical
and radiological outcomes of TKR performed by an experienced surgeon
using the QS approach with or without navigational assistance (NA),
or using a mini-medial parapatellar (MP) approach. In all, 100 patients
completed a minimum two-year follow-up: 30 in the NA-QS group, 35
in the QS group, and 35 in the MP group. There were no significant
differences in clinical outcome in terms of ability to perform a
straight-leg raise at 24 hours (p = 0.700), knee score (p = 0.952),
functional score (p = 0.229) and range of movement (p = 0.732) among
the groups. The number of outliers for all three radiological parameters
of mechanical axis, frontal femoral component alignment and frontal
tibial component alignment was significantly lower in the NA-QS
group than in the QS group (p = 0.008), but no outlier was found
in the MP group. In conclusion, even after the surgeon completed a substantial
number of cases before the commencement of this study, the supplementary
intra-operative use of computer-assisted navigation with QS-TKR
still gave inferior radiological results and longer operating time,
with a similar outcome at two years when compared with a MP approach. Cite this article:
Patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) are designed
to improve the accuracy of alignment of total knee replacement (TKR).
We compared the accuracy of limb alignment and component positioning
after TKR performed using PSCGs or conventional instrumentation.
A total of 80 patients were randomised to undergo TKR with either of
the different forms of instrumentation, and radiological outcomes
and peri-operative factors such as operating time were assessed.
No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms
of tibiofemoral angle or femoral component alignment. Although the
tibial component in the PSCGs group was measurably closer to neutral
alignment than in the conventional group, the size of the difference
was very small (89.8° ( Cite this article:
Patient specific cutting guides generated by
preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the patient’s extremity
have been proposed as a method of improving the consistency of Total
Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) alignment and adding efficiency to the operative
procedure. The cost of this option was evaluated by quantifying the
savings from decreased operative time and instrument processing
costs compared to the additional cost of the MRI and the guide.
Coronal plane alignment was measured in an unselected consecutive
series of 200 TKAs, 100 with standard instrumentation and 100 with
custom cutting guides. While the cutting guides had significantly lower
total operative time and instrument processing time, the estimated
$322 savings was overwhelmed by the $1,500 additional cost of the
MRI and the cutting guide. All measures of coronal plane alignment
were equivalent between the two groups. The data does not currently
support the proposition that patient specific guides add value to
TKA.
The purpose of this study was to measure the
radiological parameters of femoral component alignment of the Oxford
Phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), and evaluate their
effect on clinical outcome. Multiple regression analysis was used
to examine the relative contributions of the radiological assessment
of femoral component alignment in 189 consecutive UKRs performed
by a single surgeon. The American Knee Society scores were compared
between groups, defined as being within or outside recommended tolerances
of the position of the femoral component. For the flexion/extension
position 21 UKRs (11.1%) lay outside the recommended limits, and for
posterior overhang of the femoral component nine (4.8%) lay outside
the range. The pre-operative hip/knee/ankle (HKA) angle, narrowest
canal distance from the distal femoral entry point of the alignment
jig and coronal entry-point position had significant effects on
the flexion/extension position. Pre-operative HKA angle had a significant
influence on posterior overhang of the femoral component. However,
there was no significant difference in American Knee Society scores
relative to the position of the femoral component.
The role of computer-assisted surgery in maintaining the level of the joint in primary knee joint replacement (TKR) has not been well defined. We undertook a blinded randomised controlled trial comparing joint-line maintenance, functional outcomes, and quality-of-life outcomes between patients undergoing computer-assisted and conventional TKR. A total of 115 patients were randomised (computer-assisted, n = 55; conventional, n = 60). Two years post-operatively no significant correlation was found between computer-assisted and conventional surgery in terms of maintaining the joint line. Those TKRs where the joint line was depressed post-operatively improved the least in terms of functional scores. No difference was detected in terms of quality-of-life outcomes. Change in joint line was found to be related to change in alignment. Change in alignment significantly affects change in joint line and functional scores.
This study used CT analysis to determine the rotational alignment of 39 painful and 26 painless fixed-bearing total knee replacements (TKRs) from a cohort of 740 NexGen Legacy posterior-stabilised and cruciate-retaining prostheses implanted between May 1996 and August 2003. The mean rotation of the tibial component was 4.3° of internal rotation (25.4° internal to 13.9° external rotation) in the painful group and 2.2° of external rotation (8.5° internal to 18.2° external rotation) in the painfree group (p = 0.024). In the painful group 17 tibial components were internally rotated more than 9° compared with none in the painfree group (p <
0.001). Additionally, six femoral components in the painful group were internally rotated more than 6° compared with none in the painfree group (p = 0.017). External rotational errors were not found to be associated with pain. Overall, 22 (56.4%) of the painful TKRs had internal rotational errors involving the femoral, the tibial or both components. It is estimated that at least 4.6% of all our TKRs have been implanted with significant internal rotational errors.
