The aim of this study was to compare any differences in the primary outcome (biphasic flexion knee moment during gait) of robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at one year post-surgery. A total of 76 patients (34 bi-UKA and 42 TKA patients) were analyzed in a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Flat ground shod gait analysis was performed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Knee flexion moment was calculated from motion capture markers and force plates. The same setup determined proprioception outcomes during a joint position sense test and one-leg standing. Surgery allocation, surgeon, and secondary outcomes were analyzed for prediction of the primary outcome from a binary regression model.Aims
Methods
The interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for
medial osteoarthritis has increased rapidly but the long-term follow-up
of the Oxford UKAs has yet to be analysed in non-designer centres.
We have examined our ten- to 15-year clinical and radiological follow-up
data for the Oxford Phase III UKAs. Between January 1999 and January 2005 a total of 138 consecutive
Oxford Phase III arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon
in 129 patients for medial compartment osteoarthritis (71 right
and 67 left knees, mean age 72.0 years (47 to 91), mean body mass
index 28.2 (20.7 to 52.2)). Both clinical data and radiographs were
prospectively recorded and obtained at intervals. Of the 129 patients,
32 patients (32 knees) died, ten patients (12 knees) were not able
to take part in the final clinical and radiological assessment due
to physical and mental conditions, but via telephone interview it
was confirmed that none of these ten patients (12 knees) had a revision
of the knee arthroplasty. One patient (two knees) was lost to follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
We evaluated the impact of pre-coating the tibial
component with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) on implant survival
in a cohort of 16 548 primary NexGen total knee replacements (TKRs)
in 14 113 patients. In 13 835 TKRs a pre-coated tray was used while
in 2713 TKRs the non-pre-coated version of the same tray was used.
All the TKRs were performed between 2001 and 2009 and were cemented.
TKRs implanted with a pre-coated tibial component had a lower cumulative
survival than those with a non-pre-coated tibial component (p =
0.01). After adjusting for diagnosis, age, gender, body mass index,
American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, femoral coupling design, surgeon
volume and hospital volume, pre-coating was an independent risk
factor for all-cause aseptic revision (hazard ratio 2.75, p = 0.006).
Revision for aseptic loosening was uncommon for both pre-coated
and non-pre-coated trays (rates of 0.12% and 0%, respectively).
Pre-coating with PMMA does not appear to be protective of revision
for this tibial tray design at short-term follow-up. Cite this article:
Smart trials are total knee tibial trial liners
with load bearing and alignment sensors that will graphically show quantitative
compartment load-bearing forces and component track patterns. These
values will demonstrate asymmetrical ligament balancing and misalignments
with the medial retinaculum temporarily closed. Currently surgeons
use feel and visual estimation of imbalance to assess soft-tissue
balancing and tracking with the medial retinaculum open, which results
in lower medial compartment loads and a wider anteroposterior tibial
tracking pattern. The sensor trial will aid the total knee replacement
surgeon in performing soft-tissue balancing by providing quantitative
visual feedback of changes in forces while performing the releases
incrementally. Initial experience using a smart tibial trial is
presented.
