Aims. To report the development of the technique for minimally invasive lumbar decompression using robotic-assisted
The aim of this study was to reassess the rate of neurological, psoas-related, and abdominal complications associated with L4-L5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) undertaken using a standardized preoperative assessment and surgical technique. This was a multicentre retrospective study involving consecutively enrolled patients who underwent L4-L5 LLIF by seven surgeons at seven institutions in three countries over a five-year period. The demographic details of the patients and the details of the surgery, reoperations and complications, including femoral and non-femoral neuropraxia, thigh pain, weakness of hip flexion, and abdominal complications, were analyzed. Neurological and psoas-related complications attributed to LLIF or posterior instrumentation and persistent symptoms were recorded at one year postoperatively.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, as well as intraoperative factors, radiation exposure, and complication rates in adult patients with degenerative disorders of the thoracic and lumbar spines who have undergone robotic-navigated spinal surgery using a contemporary system. The authors reviewed the prospectively collected data on 196 adult patients who had pedicle screws implanted with robot-navigated assistance (RNA) using the Mazor X Stealth system between June 2019 and March 2022. Pedicle screws were implanted by one experienced spinal surgeon after completion of a learning period. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was determined using intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy.Aims
Methods
To benchmark the radiation dose to patients during the course of treatment for a spinal deformity. Our radiation dose database identified 25,745 exposures of 6,017 children (under 18 years of age) and adults treated for a spinal deformity between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2016. Patients were divided into surgical (974 patients) and non-surgical (5,043 patients) cohorts. We documented the number and doses of ionizing radiation imaging events (radiographs, CT scans, or intraoperative fluoroscopy) for each patient. All the doses for plain radiographs, CT scans, and intraoperative fluoroscopy were combined into a single effective dose by a medical physicist (milliSivert (mSv)).Aims
Methods
Aims. The aim of this study was to systematically compare the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted (RA) technique with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted (CT) pedicle screw insertion for spine disease. Methods. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the safety and accuracy of RA compared with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion for spine disease from 2012 to 2019. This meta-analysis used Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method with mixed-effects model for heterogeneity, calculating the odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, and risk of bias were analyzed. Results. Ten RCTs with 713 patients and 3,331 pedicle screws were included. Compared with CT, the accuracy rate of RA was superior in Grade A with statistical significance and Grade A + B without statistical significance. Compared with CT, the operating time of RA was longer. The difference between RA and CT was statistically significant in radiation dose. Proximal facet joint violation occurred less in RA than in CT. The postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of RA was smaller than that of CT, and there were some interesting outcomes in our subgroup analysis. Conclusion. RA technique could be viewed as an accurate and safe pedicle screw implantation method compared to CT. A robotic system equipped with optical intraoperative
The direct posterior approach with subperiosteal dissection of the paraspinal muscles from the vertebrae is considered to be the standard approach for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We investigated whether or not a minimally-invasive surgery (MIS) technique could offer improved results. Consecutive AIS patients treated with an MIS technique at two tertiary centres from June 2013 to March 2016 were retrospectively included. Preoperative patient deformity characteristics, perioperative parameters, power of deformity correction, and complications were studied. A total of 93 patients were included. The outcome of the first 25 patients and the latter 68 were compared as part of our safety analysis to examine the effect of the learning curve.Aims
Methods
With the identification of literature shortfalls on the techniques employed in intraoperative navigated (ION) spinal surgery, we outline a number of measures which have been synthesised into a coherent operative technique. These include positioning, dissection, management of the reference frame, the grip, the angle of attack, the drill, the template, the pedicle screw, the wire, and navigated intrathecal analgesia. Optimizing techniques to improve accuracy allow an overall reduction of the repetition of the surgical steps with its associated productivity benefits including time, cost, radiation, and safety. Cite this article:
Aims. Intraoperative 3D
The aim of this study was to report a retrospective, consecutive
series of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who
were treated with posterior minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with
a mean follow-up of two years ( We prospectively collected the data of 70 consecutive patients
with AIS treated with MIS using three incisions and a muscle-splitting
approach by a single surgeon between June 2013 and February 2016
and these were retrospectively reviewed. There were eight male and
62 female patients with a mean age of 15 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
We aimed to retrospectively assess the accuracy and safety of
CT navigated pedicle screws and to compare accuracy in the cervical
and thoracic spine (C2-T8) with (COMB) and without (POST) prior
anterior surgery (anterior cervical discectomy or corpectomy and
fusion with ventral plating: ACDF/ACCF). A total of 592 pedicle screws, which were used in 107 consecutively
operated patients (210 COMB, 382 POST), were analysed. The accuracy
of positioning was determined according to the classification of
Gertzbein and Robbins on post-operative CT scans.Aims
Patients and Methods
We undertook a retrospective study investigating
the accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screws placed under
fluoroscopic guidance in the lumbosacral junction and lumbar spine.
The CT scans of patients were chosen from two centres: European
patients from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany,
and Asian patients from the University of Malaya, Malaysia. Screw
perforations were classified into grades 0, 1, 2 and 3. A total
of 880 percutaneous pedicle screws from 203 patients were analysed:
614 screws from 144 European patients and 266 screws from 59 Asian
patients. The mean age of the patients was 58.8 years (16 to 91)
and there were 103 men and 100 women. The total rate of perforation
was 9.9% (87 screws) with 7.4% grade 1, 2.0% grade 2 and 0.5% grade
3 perforations. The rate of perforation in Europeans was 10.4% and
in Asians was 8.6%, with no significant difference between the two
(p = 0.42). The rate of perforation was the highest in S1 (19.4%)
followed by L5 (14.9%). The accuracy and safety of percutaneous
pedicle screw placement are comparable to those cited in the literature
for the open method of pedicle screw placement. Greater caution
must be taken during the insertion of L5 and S1 percutaneous pedicle
screws owing to their more angulated pedicles, the anatomical variations
in their vertebral bodies and the morphology of the spinal canal
at this location. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether
it would be feasible to use oblique lumbar interbody fixation for
patients with degenerative lumbar disease who required a fusion
but did not have a spondylolisthesis. A series of CT digital images from 60 patients with abdominal
disease were reconstructed in three dimensions (3D) using Mimics
v10.01: a digital cylinder was superimposed on the reconstructed
image to simulate the position of an interbody screw. The optimal
entry point of the screw and measurements of its trajectory were
recorded. Next, 26 cadaveric specimens were subjected to oblique
lumbar interbody fixation on the basis of the measurements derived
from the imaging studies. These were then compared with measurements
derived directly from the cadaveric vertebrae. Our study suggested that it is easy to insert the screws for
L1/2, L2/3 and L3/4 fixation: there was no significant difference
in measurements between those of the 3-D digital images and the
cadaveric specimens. For L4/5 fixation, part of L5 inferior articular
process had to be removed to achieve the optimal trajectory of the
screw. For L5/S1 fixation, the screw heads were blocked by iliac
bone: consequently, the interior oblique angle of the cadaveric specimens
was less than that seen in the 3D digital images. We suggest that CT scans should be carried out pre-operatively
if this procedure is to be adopted in clinical practice. This will
assist in determining the feasibility of the procedure and will
provide accurate information to assist introduction of the screws. Cite this article:
We reviewed 212 consecutive patients with adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis
using all pedicle screw instrumentation in terms of clinical, radiological
and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 outcomes. In Group 1 (51
patients), the correction was performed over two rods using bilateral
segmental pedicle screws. In Group 2 (161 patients), the correction
was performed over one rod using unilateral segmental pedicle screws
with the second rod providing stability of the construct
through two-level screw fixation at proximal and distal ends. The
mean age at surgery was
14.8 years in both groups. Comparison between groups showed no significant
differences with regard to age and Risser grade at surgery, pre-
and post-operative scoliosis angle, coronal Cobb correction, length
of hospital stay and SRS scores. Correction of upper thoracic curves
was significantly better in Group 1 (p = 0.02). Increased surgical time
and intra-operative blood loss was recorded in Group 1 (p <
0.001
and p = 0.04, respectively). The implant cost was reduced by mean
35% in Group 2 due to the lesser number of pedicle screws. Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw techniques have both achieved
excellent deformity correction in adolescent patients with idiopathic
scoliosis, which was maintained at two-year follow-up. This has
been associated with high patient satisfaction and low complication
rates.