Rotator cuff tears are common in middle-aged and elderly patients. Despite advances in the surgical repair of rotator cuff tears, the rates of recurrent tear remain high. This may be due to the complexity of the tendons of the rotator cuff, which contributes to an inherently hostile healing environment. During the past 20 years, there has been an increased interest in the use of biologics to complement the healing environment in the shoulder, in order to improve rotator cuff healing and reduce the rate of recurrent tears. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the current evidence for the use of forms of biological augmentation when repairing rotator cuff tears. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of surgical repair to conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of chronic/degenerative tears of the rotator cuff. PubMed, Cochrane database, and Medline were searched for randomized controlled trials published until March 2018. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality, and data were extracted for statistical analysis. The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.Aims
Materials and Methods
The number of rotator cuff repairs that are undertaken is increasing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the procedure of choice for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. We sought to determine whether patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and subsequent RSA had different outcomes compared with a matched control group who underwent RSA without a previous rotator cuff repair. All patients with a history of rotator cuff repair who underwent RSA between 2000 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of two years were eligible for inclusion as the study group. Outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, were compared with a matched control group of patients who underwent RSA without having previously undergone rotator cuff repair.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. Advances in arthroscopic techniques for rotator cuff repair have
made the
A trial-based comparison of the use of resources, costs and quality
of life outcomes of arthroscopic and open surgical management for
rotator cuff tears in the United Kingdom NHS was performed using
data from the United Kingdom Rotator Cuff Study (UKUFF) randomised
controlled trial. Using data from 273 patients, healthcare-related use of resources,
costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated at
12 months and 24 months after surgery on an intention-to-treat basis
with adjustment for covariates. Uncertainty about the incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio for arthroscopic Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to analyse human muscle tissue before
and after rotator cuff repair to look for evidence of regeneration,
and to characterise the changes seen in the type of muscle fibre. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and one year post-operatively
using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and MRI. The cross-sectional
area and distribution of the type of muscle fibre were assessed
on biopsies, which were taken at surgery and one year post-operatively.
Paired samples from eight patients were analysed. There were three
men and five women with a mean age of 63 years (50 to 73).Aims
Patients and Methods
This study compared the clinical outcomes following
mini-open rotator cuff repair (MORCR) between early mobilisation
and usual care, involving initial immobilisation. In total, 189
patients with radiologically-confirmed full-thickness rotator cuff
tears underwent MORCR and were randomised to either early mobilisation
(n = 97) or standard rehabilitation (n = 92) groups. Patients were
assessed at six weeks and three, six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively.
Six-week range of movement comparisons demonstrated significantly
increased abduction (p = 0.002) and scapular plane elevation (p
= 0.006) in the early mobilisation group, an effect which was not
detectable at three months (p >
0.51) or afterwards. At 24 months
post-operatively, patients who performed pain-free, early active mobilisation
for activities of daily living showed no difference in clinical
outcomes from patients immobilised for six weeks following MORCR.
We suggest that the choice of rehabilitation regime following MORCR
may be left to the discretion of the patient and the treating surgeon. Cite this article:
We explored the trends over time and the geographical
variation in the use of subacromial decompression and rotator cuff
repair in 152 local health areas (Primary Care Trusts) across England.
The diagnostic and procedure codes of patients undergoing certain
elective shoulder operations between 2000/2001 and 2009/2010 were extracted
from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. They were grouped
as 1) subacromial decompression only, 2) subacromial decompression
with rotator cuff repair, and 3) rotator cuff repair only. The number of patients undergoing subacromial decompression alone
rose by 746.4% from 2523 in 2000/2001 (5.2/100 000 (95% confidence
interval (CI) 5.0 to 5.4) to 21 355 in 2009/2010 (40.2/100 000 (95%
CI 39.7 to 40.8)). Operations for rotator cuff repair alone peaked
in 2008/2009 (4.7/100 000 (95% CI 4.5 to 4.8)) and declined considerably
in 2009/2010 (2.6/100 000 (95% CI 2.5 to 2.7)). Given the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of these operations
and the significant increase in the number of procedures being performed
in England and elsewhere, there is an urgent need for well-designed
clinical trials to determine evidence of clinical effectiveness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:70–4.
