The aim of this study was to compare the maximum
laxity conferred by the cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilised
(PS) Triathlon single-radius total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for anterior
drawer, varus–valgus opening and rotation in eight cadaver knees
through a defined arc of flexion (0º to 110º). The null hypothesis
was that the limits of laxity of CR- and PS-TKAs are not significantly
different. The investigation was undertaken in eight loaded cadaver knees
undergoing subjective stress testing using a measurement rig. Firstly
the native knee was tested prior to preparation for CR-TKA and subsequently
for PS-TKA implantation. Surgical navigation was used to track maximal
displacements/rotations at 0º, 30º, 60º, 90º and 110° of flexion.
Mixed-effects modelling was used to define the behaviour of the
TKAs. The laxity measured for the CR- and PS-TKAs revealed no statistically
significant differences over the studied flexion arc for the two
versions of TKA. Compared with the native knee both TKAs exhibited
slightly increased anterior drawer and decreased varus-valgus and
internal-external roational laxities. We believe further study is required
to define the clinical states for which the additional constraint
offered by a PS-TKA implant may be beneficial. Cite this article:
We report the clinical outcome and findings at
second-look arthroscopy of 216 patients (mean age 25 years (11 to 58))
who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or
augmentation. There were 73 single-bundle ACL augmentations (44
female, 29 male), 82 double-bundle ACL reconstructions (35 female,
47 male), and 61 single-bundle ACL reconstructions (34 female, 27
male). In 94 of the 216 patients, proprioceptive function of the knee
was evaluated before and 12 months after surgery using the threshold
to detect passive motion test. Second-look arthroscopy showed significantly better synovial
coverage of the graft in the augmentation group (good: 60 (82%),
fair: 10 (14%), poor: 3 (4%)) than in the other groups (p = 0.039).
The mean side-to-side difference measured with a KT-2000 arthrometer
was 0.4 mm (-3.3 to 2.9) in the augmentation group, 0.9 mm (-3.2
to 3.5) in the double-bundle group, and 1.3 mm (-2.7 to 3.9) in
the single-bundle group: the result differed significantly between
the augmentation and single-bundle groups (p = 0 .013). No significant
difference in the Lysholm score or pivot-shift test was seen between
the three groups (p = 0.09 and 0.65, respectively). In patients
with good synovial coverage, three of the four measurements used
revealed significant improvement in proprioceptive function (p = 0.177,
0.020, 0.034, and 0.026). We conclude that ACL augmentation is a reasonable treatment option
for patients with favourable ACL remnants. Cite this article:
We have investigated the changes in anterior laxity of the knee in response to direct electrical stimulation of eight normal and 45 reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs). In the latter, the mean time from reconstruction was 26.7 months (24 to 32). The ACL was stimulated electrically using a bipolar electrode probe during arthroscopy. Anterior laxity was examined with the knee flexed at 20° under a force of 134 N applied anteriorly to the tibia using the KT-2000 knee arthrometer before, during and after electrical stimulation. Anterior tibial translation in eight normal and 17 ACL-reconstructed knees was significantly decreased during stimulation, compared with that before stimulation. In 28 knees with reconstruction of the ACL, in 22 of which the grafts were found to have detectable somatosensory evoked potentials during stimulation, anterior tibial translation was not decreased. These findings suggest that the ACL-hamstring reflex arc in normal knees may contribute to the functional stability and that this may not be fully restored after some reconstructions of the ACL.
