We describe the use of a protocol of irrigation and debridement
(I&
D) with retention of the implant for the treatment of periprosthetic
infection of a total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). This may be an attractive
alternative to staged re-implantation. Between 1990 and 2010, 23 consecutive patients were treated in
this way. Three were lost to follow-up leaving 20 patients (21 TEAs)
in the study. There were six men and 14 women. Their mean age was
58 years (23 to 76). The protocol involved: component unlinking,
irrigation and debridement (I&
D), and the introduction of antibiotic
laden cement beads; organism-specific intravenous antibiotics; repeat
I&
D and re-linkage of the implant if appropriate; long-term
oral antibiotic therapy. Aims
Patients and Methods
We report our experience of staged revision surgery
for the treatment of infected total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Between
1998 and 2010 a consecutive series of 33 patients (34 TEAs) underwent
a first-stage procedure with the intention to proceed to second-stage
procedure when the infection had been controlled. A single first-stage procedure
with removal of the components and cement was undertaken for 29
TEAs (85%), followed by the insertion of antibiotic-impregnated
cement beads, and five (15%) required two or more first-stage procedures.
The most common organism isolated was coagulase-negative A second-stage procedure was performed for 26 TEAs (76%); seven
patients (seven TEAs, 21%) had a functional resection arthroplasty
with antibiotic beads There were three recurrent infections (11.5%) in those patients
who underwent a second-stage procedure. The infection presented
at a mean of eight months (5 to 10) post-operatively. The mean Mayo
Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) in those who underwent a second stage
revision without recurrent infection was 81.1 (65 to 95). Staged revision surgery is successful in the treatment of patients
with an infected TEA and is associated with a low rate of recurrent
infection. However, when infection does occur, this study would
suggest that it becomes apparent within ten months of the second
stage procedure. Cite this article:
