The aim of the present study was to assess the outcomes of the induced membrane technique (IMT) for the management of infected segmental bone defects, and to analyze predictive factors associated with unfavourable outcomes. Between May 2012 and December 2020, 203 patients with infected segmental bone defects treated with the IMT were enrolled. The digital medical records of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. Factors associated with unfavourable outcomes were identified through logistic regression analysis.Aims
Methods
This is a prospective randomised study which compares the radiological
and functional outcomes of ring and rail fixators in patients with
an infected gap (>
3 cm) nonunion of the tibia. Between May 2008 and February 2013, 70 patients were treated
at our Institute for a posttraumatic osseocutaneous defect of the
tibia measuring at least 3 cm. These were randomised into two groups
of 35 patients using the lottery method. Group I patients were treated
with a ring fixator and group II patients with a rail fixator. The
mean age was 33.2 years (18 to 64) in group I and 29.3 years (18
to 65) in group II. The mean bone gap was 5.84 cm in group I and 5.78
cm in group II. The mean followup was 33.8 months in group I and 32.6 months
in group II. Bone and functional results were assessed using the
classification of the Association for the Study and Application
of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI). Functional results were also
assessed at six months using the short musculoskeletal functional
assessment (SMFA) score.Aims
Patients and Methods
To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal
fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between
two different models of a single implant type. A total of 136 patients who received either a 2.4 mm (n = 61)
or 3.5 mm (n = 75) distal radius locking compression plate (LCP
DR) using a volar approach were followed over two years. The main
outcome measurements included motion, grip strength, pain, and the
scores of Gartland and Werley, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH). Differences
between the treatment groups were evaluated using regression analysis
and the likelihood ratio test with significance based on the Bonferroni
corrected p-value of <
0.003.Objectives
Methods