The aim of this study was to report our experience at 3.5 years with outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this prospective cohort study, we included all patients who were planned to receive primary THA through the anterior approach between 1 April 2014 and 1 October 2017. Patient-related data and surgical information were recorded. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) related to the hip and an anchor question were taken preoperatively, at six weeks, three months, and one year after surgery. All complications, readmissions, and reoperations were registered.Aims
Methods
Only limited data are available regarding the
infiltration of local anaesthetic for total hip arthroplasty (THA),
and no studies were performed for THA using the anterior approach. In this prospective, randomised placebo-controlled study we investigated
the effect of both standard and reverse infiltration of local anaesthetic
in combination with the anterior approach for THA. The primary endpoint
was the mean numeric rating score for pain four hours post-operatively.
In addition, we recorded the length of hospital stay, the operating
time, the destination of the patient at discharge, the use of pain
medication, the occurrence of side effects and pain scores at various
times post-operatively. Between November 2012 and January 2014, 75 patients were included
in the study. They were randomised into three groups: standard infiltration
of local anaesthetic, reversed infiltration of local anaesthetic,
and placebo. There was no difference in mean numeric rating score
for pain four hours post-operatively (p = 0.87). There were significantly
more side effects at one and eight hours post-operatively in the
placebo group (p = 0.02; p = 0.03), but this did not influence the
mobilisation of the patients. There were no differences in all other
outcomes between the groups. We found no clinically relevant effect when the infiltration
of local anaesthetic with ropivacaine and epinephrine was used in
a multimodal pain protocol for THA using the anterior approach. Cite this article:
The outcome after total hip replacement has improved
with the development of surgical techniques, better pain management
and the introduction of enhanced recovery pathways. These pathways
require a multidisciplinary team to manage pre-operative education,
multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation. The current economic
climate and restricted budgets favour brief hospitalisation while
minimising costs. This has put considerable pressure on hospitals
to combine excellent results, early functional recovery and shorter
admissions. In this review we present an evidence-based summary of some common
interventions and methods, including pre-operative patient education,
pre-emptive analgesia,
