The results of kinematic total knee arthroplasty (KTKA) have been reported in terms of limb and component alignment parameters but not in terms of gap laxities and differentials. In kinematic alignment (KA), balance should reflect the asymmetrical balance of the normal knee, not the classic rectangular flexion and extension gaps sought with gap-balanced mechanical axis total knee arthroplasty (MATKA). This paper aims to address the following questions: 1) what factors determine coronal joint congruence as measured on standing radiographs?; 2) is flexion gap asymmetry produced with KA?; 3) does lateral flexion gap laxity affect outcomes?; 4) is lateral flexion gap laxity associated with lateral extension gap laxity?; and 5) can consistent ligament balance be produced without releases? A total of 192 KTKAs completed by a single surgeon using a computer-assisted technique were followed for a mean of 3.5 years (2 to 5). There were 116 male patients (60%) and 76 female patients (40%) with a mean age of 65 years (48 to 88). Outcome measures included intraoperative gap laxity measurements and component positions, as well as joint angles from postoperative three-foot standing radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed in terms of alignment and balance: EuroQol (EQ)-5D visual analogue scale (VAS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), KOOS Joint Replacement (JR), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).Aims
Patients and Methods
Medium-term survivorship of the Oxford phase
3 unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has not yet been established
in an Asian population. We prospectively evaluated the outcome of
400 phase 3 Oxford UKRs in 320 Korean patients with a mean age at
the time of operation of 69 years (48 to 82). The mean follow-up
was 5.2 years (1 to 10). Clinical and radiological assessment was
carried out pre- and post-operatively. At five years, the mean Knee
Society knee and functional scores had increased significantly from
56.2 (30 to 91) pre-operatively to 87.2 (59 to 98) (p = 0.034) and
from 59.2 (30 to 93) to 88.3 (50 to 100) (p = 0.021), respectively.
The Oxford knee score increased from a mean of 25.8 (12 to 39) pre-operatively
to 39.8 (25 to 58) at five years (p = 0.038). The ten-year survival
rate was 94% (95% confidence interval 90.1 to 98.0). A total of
14 UKRs (3.5%) required revision. The most common reason for revision
was dislocation of the bearing in 12 (3%). Conversion to a total
knee replacement was required in two patients who developed osteoarthritis
of the lateral compartment. This is the largest published series of UKR in Korean patients.
It shows that the mid-term results after a minimally invasive Oxford
phase 3 UKR can yield satisfactory clinical and functional results
in this group of patients.
