Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 342 - 351
14 Mar 2025
Salunke AA Bharwani N Patel D Varun M Patel K Warikoo V Sharma M Pandya S

Aims

Reconstruction of soft tissues and preservation of the extensor mechanism integrity provide a major challenge following resection of the proximal tibia tumours. We propose a novel surgical technique for neopatellar ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon in proximal tibia tumour cases. This study details the surgical technique, early clinical and radiological outcomes, and the potential long-term benefits of this innovative reconstructive approach following proximal tibia megaprosthesis implantation.

Methods

This study included 15 patients with proximal tibia tumours treated at orthopaedic oncology unit in Gujarat Cancer and Research Institue (GCRI), Ahmedabad, India. Surgical procedures included resecting the proximal tibia tumour, implanting a megaprosthesis, and using hamstring tendons to reconstruct the extensor mechanism by the neopatellar ligament. Autologous hamstring tendons (gracilis and semitendinosus) harvested from the ipsilateral leg were used and these tendons were braided together with a nonabsorbable suture and threaded through the remaining patellar tendon. The braided tendons were then secured to the holes in the tibial tuberosity of the proximal tibia megaprosthesis implant XLO (Ortho Life Systems, India) using nonabsorbable fibre wire sutures FiberWire (Arthrex, USA). The tension in the tendons was optimized and the sutures were tightened with the knee in full extension and the implant with neopatellar ligament were covered by medial gastrocnemius muscle flap. The mean follow-up period was 19 months (13 to 24), the mean age of the study group was 24.6 years (14 to 44), and it included 11 males and four females.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 5 | Pages 683 - 688
1 May 2013
Chen Y Tai BC Nayak D Kumar N Chua KH Lim JW Goy RWL Wong HK

There is currently no consensus about the mean volume of blood lost during spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. We conducted a systematic review of papers published in the English language between 31 January 1992 and 31 January 2012. Only papers that clearly presented blood loss data in spinal surgery for metastatic disease were included. The random effects model was used to obtain the pooled estimate of mean blood loss.

We selected 18 papers, including six case series, ten retrospective reviews and two prospective studies. Altogether, there were 760 patients who had undergone spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. The pooled estimate of peri-operative blood loss was 2180 ml (95% confidence interval 1805 to 2554) with catastrophic blood loss as high as 5000 ml, which is rare. Aside from two studies that reported large amounts of mean blood loss (> 5500 ml), the resulting funnel plot suggested an absence of publication bias. This was confirmed by Egger’s test, which did not show any small-study effects (p = 0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 90%; p < 0.001).

Spinal surgery for metastatic disease is associated with significant blood loss and the possibility of catastrophic blood loss. There is a need to establish standardised methods of calculating and reporting this blood loss. Analysis should include assessment by area of the spine, primary pathology and nature of surgery so that the amount of blood loss can be predicted. Consideration should be given to autotransfusion in these patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:683–8.