The treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia is complex and makes great demands on the implants used. Our study aimed to identify what levels of primary stability could be achieved with various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the proximal tibia. Pairs of human tibiae were investigated. An unstable fracture was simulated by creating a defect at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Six implants were tested in a uniaxial testing device (Instron) using the quasi-static and displacement-controlled modes and the force-displacement curve was recorded. The movements of each fragment and of the implant were recorded video-optically (MacReflex, Qualysis). Axial deviations were evaluated at 300 N.

The results show that the nailing systems tolerated the highest forces. The lowest axial deviations in varus and valgus were also found for the nailing systems; the highest axial deviations were recorded for the buttress plate and the less invasive stabilising system (LISS). In terms of rotational displacement the LISS was better than the buttress plate.

In summary, it was found that higher loads were better tolerated by centrally placed load carriers than by eccentrically placed ones. In the case of the latter, it appears advantageous to use additive procedures for medial buttressing in the early phase.

The direction of wear in the acetabular socket has implications for the amount of debris that is generated during movement, for the magnitude of eccentric loading and for the incidence of impingement of the neck. We observed the direction of penetration with respect to a global co-ordinate system in 84 acetabular components retrieved at reoperation. The mean direction of wear relative to the open face of the sockets was found to be 37° with a range from 0° to 87°. For those values determined using the inclination of the socket on the prerevision radiograph, the mean direction of penetration in the coronal plane had a lateral, rather than a medial, component. The mean angle was 84° (SD 17°) with respect to the horizontal. The angle of penetration was found to correlate significantly with the depth, in that the lateral component became larger as the wear progressed. There was also a significant correlation between the rate of penetration and the direction of wear. Despite the theoretical advantage of penetration in the superolateral direction, i.e., along the margin of the socket, in reducing the probability of impingement of the neck, no significant correlation was seen between the angle of penetration and the period of use in vivo. This may suggest that impingement of the femoral neck on the rim of the socket may not be the dominant factor in loosening of the socket but can still be important in a few cases