Our aim in this study was to describe a continuing review of
11 total hip arthroplasties using 22.225 mm Alumina ceramic femoral
heads on a Charnley flanged femoral component, articulating against
a silane crosslinked polyethylene. Nine patients (11 THAs) were reviewed at a mean of 27.5 years
(26 to 28) post-operatively. Outcome was assessed using the d’Aubigne
and Postel, and Charnley scores and penetration was recorded on
radiographs. In addition, the oxidation of a 29-year-old shelf-aged
acetabular component was analysed.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of aseptic
loosening after the use of a cemented acetabular component and a
Trabecular Metal (TM) acetabular component (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw,
Indiana) at acetabular revision with bone impaction grafting. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. Patients were
randomised to receive an all- polyethylene cemented acetabular component
(n = 19) or a TM component (n = 23). Radiostereometric analysis
and conventional radiographic examinations were performed regularly
up to two years post-operatively or until further revision.Aims
Patients and Methods
The outcome of 219 revision total hip arthroplasties
(THAs) in 98 male and 121 female patients, using 137 long length
and 82 standard length cemented collarless double-taper femoral
stems in 211 patients, with a mean age of 72 years (30 to 90) and
mean follow-up of six years (two to 18) have been described previously.
We have extended the follow-up to a mean of 13 years (8 to 20) in
this cohort of patients in which the pre-operative bone deficiency Paprosky
grading was IIIA or worse in 79% and 73% of femurs with long and
standard stems, respectively. For the long stem revision group, survival to re-revision for
aseptic loosening at 14 years was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI)
91 to 100) and in patients aged >
70 years, survival was 100%. Two
patients (two revisions) were lost to follow-up and 86 patients
with 88 revisions had died. Worst-case analysis for survival to
re-revision for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 95% (95% CI 89
to 100) and 99% (95% CI 96 to 100) for patients aged >
70 years. One
additional long stem was classified as loose radiographically but
not revised. For the standard stem revision group, survival to re-revision
for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 91% (95% CI 83 to 99). No
patients were lost to follow-up and 49 patients with 51 hips had
died. No additional stems were classified as loose radiographically. Femoral revision using a cemented collarless double-taper stem,
particularly with a long length stem, and in patients aged >
70
years, continues to yield excellent results up to 20 years post-operatively,
including in hips with considerable femoral metaphyseal bone loss. Cite this article:
In 2012 we reviewed a consecutive series of 92
uncemented THRs performed between 1986 and 1991 at our institution
using the CLS Spotorno stem, in order to assess clinical outcome
and radiographic data at a minimum of 21 years. The series comprised
92 patients with a mean age at surgery of 59.6 years (39 to 77)
(M:F 43;49). At the time of this review, seven (7.6%) patients had died and
two (2.2%) were lost to follow-up. The 23-year Kaplan–Meier survival
rates were 91.5% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 85.4% to 97.6%;
55 hips at risk) and 80.3% (95% CI, 71.8% to 88.7%; 48 hips at risk)
respectively, with revision of the femoral stem or of any component
as endpoints. At the time of this review, 76 patients without stem
revision were assessed clinically and radiologically (mean follow-up
24.0 years (21.5 to 26.5)). For the 76 unrevised hips the mean Harris
hip score was 87.1 (65 to 97). Femoral osteolysis was detected in
five hips (6.6%) only in Gruen zone 7. Undersized stems were at
higher risk of revision owing to aseptic loosening (p = 0.0003).
Patients implanted with the stem in a varus position were at higher risk
of femoral cortical hypertrophy and thigh pain (p = 0.0006 and p
= 0.0007, respectively). In our study, survival, clinical outcome and radiographic data
remained excellent in the third decade after implantation. Nonetheless,
undersized stems were at higher risk of revision owing to aseptic
loosening. Cite this article:
Conventional uncemented femoral implants provide
dependable long-term fixation in patients with a wide range of functional
requirements. Yet challenges associated with proximal–distal femoral
dimensional mismatch, preservation of bone stock, and minimally
invasive approaches have led to exploration into alternative implant designs.
Short stem designs focusing on a stable metaphyseal fit have emerged
to address these issues in total hip replacement (THR). Uncemented
metaphyseal-engaging short stem implants are stable and are associated
with proximal bone remodeling closer to the metaphysis when compared
with conventional stems and they also have comparable clinical performances.
Short stem metaphyseal-engaging implants can meet the goals of a
successful THR, including tolerating a high level of patient function,
as well as durable fixation. Cite this article:
We prospectively evaluated the long-term outcome of 158 consecutive patients who underwent revision total hip replacement using uncemented computer-assisted design-computer-assisted manufacture femoral components. There were 97 men and 61 women. Their mean age was 63.1 years (34.6 to 85.9). The mean follow-up was 10.8 years (10 to 12). The mean Oxford, Harris and Western Ontario and McMaster hip scores improved from 41.1, 44.2 and 52.4 pre-operatively to 18.2, 89.3 and 12.3, respectively (p <
0.0001, for each). Six patients required further surgery. The overall survival of the femoral component was 97% (95% confidence interval 94.5 to 99.7). These results are comparable to those of previously published reports for revision total hip replacement using either cemented or uncemented components.
We present the clinical and radiographic outcome of 68 consecutive primary total hip replacements performed in 54 patients under the age of 55 years using a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component and threaded cup with a modular ceramic head (JRI-Furlong). We reviewed 62 (91%) hips at a median follow-up of 8.8 years (5 to 13.8) after implantation; six (9%) were lost to follow-up. At review there had been four (6%) revisions but only one for aseptic loosening (acetabulum). Radiographic review of the remaining hips did not identify any evidence of femoral or acetabular loosening. The median Harris and Merle d’Aubigné and Postel hip scores were 95.9 (42.7 to 100) and 17 (3 to 18) respectively. The JRI-Furlong hip gives promising functional and radiographic results in young patients in the medium term.
Reorientation of the acetabulum may be required in adolescents and young adults with developmental dysplasia of the hip. We have carried out a retrospective review of 51 hips after triple osteotomy with an average follow-up of ten years (8 to 15). Forty-eight hips (94%) were available for review and of these 39 (81%) were improved compared with before operation, 29 (60%) scoring good or excellent. Radiographic assessment showed improvement of the average centre-edge angle by 19°, the acetabular index by 12° and the anterior centre-edge angle by 26°. The degree of osteoarthritis progressed by one grade in ten hips (21%) over a period of ten years. The satisfactory long-term
