In this randomized study, we aimed to compare quality of regenerate in monolateral Both groups were comparable in demographic and injury characteristics. A phantom (aluminium step wedge of increasing thickness) was designed to compare the density of regenerate on radiographs. A CT scan was performed at three and six months postoperatively to assess regenerate density. A total of 30 patients (29 male, one female; mean age 32.54 years (18 to 60)) with an infected nonunion of a tibial fracture presenting to our tertiary institute between June 2011 and April 2016 were included in the study.Aims
Patients and Methods
Demineralised bone matrix (DBM) is rarely used for the local
delivery of prophylactic antibiotics. Our aim, in this study, was
to show that a graft with a bioactive glass and DBM combination,
which is currently available for clinical use, can be loaded with
tobramycin and release levels of antibiotic greater than the minimum
inhibitory concentration for Antibiotic was loaded into a graft and subsequently evaluated
for drug elution kinetics and the inhibition of bacterial growth.
A rat femoral condylar plug model was used to determine the effect
of the graft, loaded with antibiotic, on bone healing.Aims
Materials and Methods
We reviewed 27 diabetic patients who sustained a tibial fracture treated with a reamed intramedullary nail and compared them with a control group who did not have diabetes. There were 23 closed fractures and four were open. Union was delayed until after six months in 12 of the 23 (52%) diabetic patients with closed fractures and ten of the 23 (43%) control patients (p = 0.768). In two patients with diabetes (9%), closed tibial fractures failed to unite and required exchange nailing, whereas all closed fractures in the control group healed without further surgery (p = 0.489). In both the diabetic and control groups with closed fractures two patients (9%) developed superficial infections. There were two (9%) deep infections in diabetic patients with closed fractures, but none in the control group (p = 0.489). Overall, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the diabetic patients and the control group, but there was a tendency for more severe infections in patients with diabetes.
