Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 92-B, Issue 3 | Pages 329 - 334
1 Mar 2010
Cox G Einhorn TA Tzioupis C Giannoudis PV

Biochemical markers of bone-turnover have long been used to complement the radiological assessment of patients with metabolic bone disease. Their implementation in daily clinical practice has been helpful in the understanding of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, the selection of the optimal dose and the understanding of the progression of the onset and resolution of treatment. Since they are derived from both cortical and trabecular bone, they reflect the metabolic activity of the entire skeleton rather than that of individual cells or the process of mineralisation.

Quantitative changes in skeletal-turnover can be assessed easily and non-invasively by the measurement of bone-turnover markers. They are commonly subdivided into three categories; 1) bone-resorption markers, 2) osteoclast regulatory proteins and 3) bone-formation markers. Because of the rapidly accumulating new knowledge of bone matrix biochemistry, attempts have been made to use them in the interpretation and characterisation of various stages of the healing of fractures. Early knowledge of the individual progress of a fracture could help to avoid delayed or nonunion by enabling modification of the host’s biological response.

The levels of bone-turnover markers vary throughout the course of fracture repair with their rates of change being dependent on the size of the fracture and the time that it will take to heal. However, their short-term biological variability, the relatively low bone specificity exerted, given that the production and destruction of collagen is not limited to bone, as well as the influence of the host’s metabolism on their concentration, produce considerable intra- and inter-individual variability in their interpretation. Despite this, the possible role of bone-turnover markers in the assessment of progression to union, the risks of delayed or nonunion and the impact of innovations to accelerate fracture healing must not be ignored.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 8 | Pages 987 - 996
1 Aug 2009
Alsousou J Thompson M Hulley P Noble A Willett K

Although mechanical stabilisation has been a hallmark of orthopaedic surgical management, orthobiologics are now playing an increasing role. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a volume of plasma fraction of autologous blood having platelet concentrations above baseline. The platelet α granules are rich in growth factors that play an essential role in tissue healing, such as transforming growth factor-β, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor. PRP is used in various surgical fields to enhance bone and soft-tissue healing by placing supraphysiological concentrations of autologous platelets at the site of tissue damage. The easily obtainable PRP and its possible beneficial outcome hold promise for new regenerative treatment approaches.

The aim of this literature review was to describe the bioactivities of PRP, to elucidate the different techniques for PRP preparation, to review animal and human studies, to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of PRP in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, to clarify risks, and to provide guidance for future research.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 5 | Pages 565 - 576
1 May 2009
Getgood A Brooks R Fortier L Rushton N

Articular cartilage repair remains a challenge to surgeons and basic scientists. The field of tissue engineering allows the simultaneous use of material scaffolds, cells and signalling molecules to attempt to modulate the regenerative tissue. This review summarises the research that has been undertaken to date using this approach, with a particular emphasis on those techniques that have been introduced into clinical practice, via in vitro and preclinical studies.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 8 | Pages 981 - 987
1 Aug 2008
Whittaker JP Dharmarajan R Toms AD

The management of bone loss in revision replacement of the knee remains a challenge despite an array of options available to the surgeon. Bone loss may occur as a result of the original disease, the design of the prosthesis, the mechanism of failure or technical error at initial surgery. The aim of revision surgery is to relieve pain and improve function while addressing the mechanism of failure in order to reconstruct a stable platform with transfer of load to the host bone. Methods of reconstruction include the use of cement, modular metal augmentation of prostheses, custom-made, tumour-type or hinged implants and bone grafting.

The published results of the surgical techniques are summarised and a guide for the management of bone defects in revision surgery of the knee is presented.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1553 - 1560
1 Dec 2007
Gaston MS Simpson AHRW

This paper reviews the current literature concerning the main clinical factors which can impair the healing of fractures and makes recommendations on avoiding or minimising these in order to optimise the outcome for patients. The clinical implications are described.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 4 | Pages 425 - 433
1 Apr 2007
Little DG Ramachandran M Schindeler A

The literature on fracture repair has been reviewed. The traditional concepts of delayed and nonunion have been examined in terms of the phased and balanced anabolic and catabolic responses in bone repair. The role of medical manipulation of these inter-related responses in the fracture healing have been considered.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1272 - 1278
1 Oct 2006
Giannoudis PV Schneider E

Despite advances in the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures, their prevalence continues to increase. Their operative treatment remains a challenge for the surgeon, often with unpredictable outcomes. This review highlights the current aspects of management of these fractures and focuses on advances in implant design and surgical technique.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 7 | Pages 841 - 851
1 Jul 2006
Lee EH Hui JHP


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 6 | Pages 701 - 705
1 Jun 2006
Simpson AHRW Mills L Noble B