Complex displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures in the elderly are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Surgical options include either open reduction and internal fixation alone, or combined with total hip arthroplasty (THA). There remains a cohort of severely comorbid patients who are deemed unfit for extensive surgical reconstruction and are treated conservatively. We describe the results of a coned hemipelvis reconstruction and THA inserted via a posterior approach to the hip as the primary treatment for this severely high-risk cohort. We have prospectively monitored a series of 22 cases (21 patients) with a mean follow-up of 32 months (13 to 59).Aims
Methods
In this study we quantified and characterised
the return of functional mobility following open tibial fracture
using the Hamlyn Mobility Score. A total of 20 patients who had
undergone reconstruction following this fracture were reviewed at
three-month intervals for one year. An ear-worn movement sensor
was used to assess their mobility and gait. The Hamlyn Mobility
Score and its constituent kinematic features were calculated longitudinally,
allowing analysis of mobility during recovery and between patients
with varying grades of fracture. The mean score improved throughout
the study period. Patients with more severe fractures recovered
at a slower rate; those with a grade I Gustilo-Anderson fracture
completing most of their recovery within three months, those with
a grade II fracture within six months and those with a grade III
fracture within nine months. Analysis of gait showed that the quality of walking continued
to improve up to 12 months post-operatively, whereas the capacity
to walk, as measured by the six-minute walking test, plateaued after
six months. Late complications occurred in two patients, in whom the trajectory
of recovery deviated by >
0.5 standard deviations below that of
the remaining patients. This is the first objective, longitudinal
assessment of functional recovery in patients with an open tibial
fracture, providing some clarification of the differences in prognosis
and recovery associated with different grades of fracture. Cite this article: