The scapula is a rare site for a primary bone tumour. Only a small number of series have studied patient outcomes after treatment. Previous studies have shown a high rate of recurrence, with functional outcomes determined by the preservation of the glenohumeral joint and deltoid. The purpose of the current study was to report the outcome of patients who had undergone tumour resection that included the scapula. We reviewed 61 patients (37 male, 24 female; mean age 42 years (SD 19)) who had undergone resection of the scapula. The most common resection was type 2 (n = 34) according to the Tikhoff-Linberg classification, or type S1A (n = 35) on the Enneking classification.Aims
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 33
consecutive patients who had undergone an extra-articular, total or
partial scapulectomy for a malignant tumour of the shoulder girdle
between 1 July 2001 and 30 September 2013. Of these, 26 had tumours
which originated in the scapula or the adjacent soft tissue and
underwent a classic Tikhoff–Linberg procedure, while seven with
tumours arising from the proximal humerus were treated with a modified
Tikhoff-Linberg operation. We used a Ligament Advanced Reinforcement
System for soft-tissue reconstruction in nine patients, but not
in the other 24. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) was 17.6
(95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9 to 19.4); 17.6 (95% CI 15.5 to
19.6) after the classic Tikhoff–Linberg procedure and 18.1 (95%
CI 13.8 to 22.3) after the modified Tikhoff–Linberg procedure. Patients
who had undergone a LARS soft-tissue reconstruction had a mean score
of 18.6 (95% (CI) 13.9 to 22.4) compared with 17.2 (95% CI 15.5
to 19.0) for those who did not. The Tikhoff–Linberg procedure is a useful method for wide resection
of a malignant tumour of the shoulder girdle which helps to preserve
hand and elbow function. The method of soft-tissue reconstruction
has no effect on functional outcome. Cite this article:
We retrospectively studied 14 patients with proximal and diaphyseal tumours and disappearing bone (Gorham’s) disease of the humerus treated with wide resection and reconstruction using an allograft-resurfacing composite (ARC). There were ten women and four men, with a mean age of 35 years (8 to 69). At a mean follow-up of 25 months (10 to 89), two patients had a fracture of the allograft. In one of these it was revised with a similar ARC and in the other with an intercalary prosthesis. A further patient had an infection and a fracture of the allograft that was revised with a megaprosthesis. In all patients with an ARC, healing of the ARC-host bone interface was observed. One patient had failure of the locking mechanism of the total elbow replacement. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for the upper extremity was 77% (46.7% to 86.7%), which represents good and excellent results; one patient had a poor result (46.7%). In the short term ARC effectively relieves pain and restores shoulder function in patients with wide resection of the proximal humerus. Fracture and infection remain significant complications.
Between 1997 and 2007, 68 consecutive patients underwent replacement of the proximal humerus for tumour using a fixed-fulcrum massive endoprosthesis. Their mean age was 46 years (7 to 87). Ten patients were lost to follow-up and 16 patients died. The 42 surviving patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) Score and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at a mean follow-up of five years and 11 months (one year to ten years and nine months). The mean MSTS score was 72.3% (53.3% to 100%) and the mean TESS was 77.2% (58.6% to 100%). Four of 42 patients received a new constrained humeral liner to reduce the risk of dislocation. This subgroup had a mean MSTS score of 77.7% and a mean TESS of 80.0%. The dislocation rate for the original prosthesis was 25.9; none of the patients with the new liner had a dislocation at a mean of 14.5 months (12 to 18). Endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal humerus using this prosthesis is a reliable operation yielding good results without the documented problems of unconstrained prostheses. The performance of this prosthesis is expected to improve further with a new constrained humeral liner, which reduces the risk of dislocation.
