The aim of this study was to identify the optimal lip position for total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using a lipped liner. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal position, with substantial variability in surgeon practice. A model of a THA was developed using a 20° lipped liner. Kinematic analyses included a physiological range of motion (ROM) analysis and a provocative dislocation manoeuvre analysis. ROM prior to impingement was calculated and, in impingement scenarios, the travel distance prior to dislocation was assessed. The combinations analyzed included nine cup positions (inclination 30-40-50°, anteversion 5-15-25°), three stem positions (anteversion 0-15-30°), and five lip orientations (right hip 7 to 11 o’clock).Aims
Methods
Registry studies on modified acetabular polyethylene (PE) liner designs are limited. We investigated the influence of standard and modified PE acetabular liner designs on the revision rate for mechanical complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). We analyzed 151,096 primary cementless THAs from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) between November 2012 and November 2020. Cumulative incidence of revision for mechanical complications for standard and four modified PE liners (lipped, offset, angulated/offset, and angulated) was determined using competing risk analysis at one and seven years. Confounders were investigated with a Cox proportional-hazards model.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine if uncemented acetabular polyethylene (PE) liner geometry, and lip size, influenced the risk of revision for instability or loosening. A total of 202,511 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with uncemented acetabular components were identified from the National Joint Registry (NJR) dataset between 2003 and 2017. The effect of liner geometry on the risk of revision for instability or loosening was investigated using competing risk regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, indication, side, institution type, surgeon grade, surgical approach, head size, and polyethylene crosslinking. Stratified analyses by surgical approach were performed, including pairwise comparisons of liner geometries.Aims
Methods
The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of asymmetric crosslinked polyethylene liner use on the risk of revision of cementless and hybrid total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We undertook a registry study combining the National Joint Registry dataset with polyethylene manufacturing characteristics as supplied by the manufacturers. The primary endpoint was revision for any reason. We performed further analyses on other reasons including instability, aseptic loosening, wear, and liner dissociation. The primary analytic approach was Cox proportional hazard regression.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify the effect of the manufacturing characteristics of polyethylene acetabular liners on the survival of cementless and hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prospective cohort study using linked National Joint Registry (NJR) and manufacturer data. The primary endpoint was revision for aseptic loosening. Cox proportional hazard regression was the primary analytical approach. Manufacturing variables included resin type, crosslinking radiation dose, terminal sterilization method, terminal sterilization radiation dose, stabilization treatment, total radiation dose, packaging, and face asymmetry. Total radiation dose was further divided into G1 (no radiation), G2 (> 0 Mrad to < 5 Mrad), G3 (≥ 5 Mrad to < 10 Mrad), and G4 (≥ 10 Mrad).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference
in the rate of wear between acetabular components positioned within
and outside the ‘safe zones’ of anteversion and inclination angle. We reviewed 100 hips in 94 patients who had undergone primary
total hip arthroplasty (THA) at least ten years previously. Patients
all had the same type of acetabular component with a bearing couple
which consisted of a 28 mm cobalt-chromium head on a highly crosslinked
polyethylene (HXLPE) liner. A supine radiostereometric analysis
(RSA) examination was carried out which acquired anteroposterior
(AP) and lateral paired images. Acetabular component anteversion
and inclination angles were measured as well as total femoral head
penetration, which was divided by the length of implantation to
determine the rate of polyethylene wear.Aims
Patients and Methods
The October 2014 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: functional acetabular orientation; predicting re-admission following THR; metal ions and resurfacing; lipped liners increase stability; all anaesthetics equal in hip fracture surgery; revision hip surgery in very young patients; and uncemented hips.
Dislocation is one of the most common causes
of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement
and to treat it, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors
include age greater than 70 years, medical comorbidities, female
gender, ligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors,
and patient education. Surgeon factors include the annual quantity
of procedures and experience, the surgical approach, adequate restoration
of femoral offset and leg length, component position, and soft-tissue
or bony impingement. Implant factors include the design of the head
and neck region, and so-called skirts on longer neck lengths. There
should be offset choices available in order to restore soft-tissue
tension.
