High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
evaluating surgical therapies are fundamental to the delivery of
evidence-based orthopaedics. Orthopaedic clinical trials have unique
challenges; however, when these challenges are overcome, evidence
from trials can be definitive in its impact on surgical practice.
In this review, we highlight several issues that pose potential
challenges to orthopaedic investigators aiming to perform surgical randomised
controlled trials. We begin with a discussion on trial design issues,
including the ethics of
Salubrinal is a synthetic agent that elevates phosphorylation
of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α) and
alleviates stress to the endoplasmic reticulum. Previously, we reported
that in chondrocytes, Salubrinal attenuates expression and activity
of matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) through downregulating nuclear
factor kappa B (NFκB) signalling. We herein examine whether Salubrinal
prevents the degradation of articular cartilage in a mouse model
of osteoarthritis (OA). OA was surgically induced in the left knee of female mice. Animal
groups included age-matched sham control, OA placebo, and OA treated
with Salubrinal or Guanabenz. Three weeks after the induction of
OA, immunoblotting was performed for NFκB p65 and p-NFκB p65. At
three and six weeks, the femora and tibiae were isolated and the sagittal
sections were stained with Safranin O.Objectives
Methods