Objectives. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine
the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes for a medial-pivot total
knee replacement (TKR) system. The objectives were to synthesise
available survivorship, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and reasons for
revision for this system. Methods. A systematic search was conducted of two online databases to
identify sources of survivorship, KSS, and reasons for revision.
Survivorship results were compared with values in the National Joint
Registry of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (NJR). Results. A total of eight studies that included data for 1146 TKRs performed
in six countries satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Pooled
component survivorship estimates were 99.2% (95% CI, 97.7 to 99.7)
and 97.6% (95% CI, 95.8 to 98.6) at five and eight years, respectively.
Survivorship was similar or better when compared with rates reported
for all cemented TKRs combined in the
The primary aim of the study was to compare the knee-specific functional outcome of robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) with manual total knee arthroplasty (mTKA) for the management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Secondary aims were to compare length of hospital stay, general health improvement, and satisfaction between rUKA and mTKA. A powered (1:3 ratio) cohort study was performed. A total of 30 patients undergoing rUKA were propensity score matched to 90 patients undergoing mTKA for isolated medial compartment arthritis. Patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and preoperative function. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were collected preoperatively and six months postoperatively. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and patient satisfaction were collected six months postoperatively. Length of hospital stay was also recorded.Aims
Methods
Mortality rates reported by the National Joint Registry for England
and Wales (NJR) were higher following cemented total knee replacement
(TKR) compared with uncemented procedures. The aim of this study
is to examine and compare the effects of cemented and uncemented
TKR on the activation of selected markers of inflammation, endothelium,
and coagulation, and on the activation of selected cytokines involved
in the various aspects of the systemic response following surgery. This was a single centre, prospective, case-control study. Following
enrolment, blood samples were taken pre-operatively, and further
samples were collected at day one and day seven post-operatively.
One patient in the cemented group developed a deep-vein thrombosis
confirmed on ultrasonography and was excluded, leaving 19 patients
in this cohort (mean age 67.4, (Objective
Methods
