High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
evaluating surgical therapies are fundamental to the delivery of
evidence-based orthopaedics. Orthopaedic clinical trials have unique
challenges; however, when these challenges are overcome, evidence
from trials can be definitive in its impact on surgical practice.
In this review, we highlight several issues that pose potential
challenges to orthopaedic investigators aiming to perform surgical randomised
controlled trials. We begin with a discussion on trial design issues,
including the ethics of sham surgery, the importance of sample size,
the need for patient-important outcomes, and overcoming expertise
bias. We then explore features surrounding the execution of surgical
randomised trials, including ethics review boards, the importance
of organisational frameworks, and obtaining adequate funding. Cite this article:
There remains conflicting evidence regarding cortical bone strength
following bisphosphonate therapy. As part of a study to assess the
effects of bisphosphonate treatment on the healing of rat tibial
fractures, the mechanical properties and radiological density of
the uninjured contralateral tibia was assessed. Skeletally mature aged rats were used. A total of 14 rats received
1µg/kg ibandronate (iban) daily and 17 rats received 1 ml 0.9% sodium
chloride (control) daily. Stress at failure and toughness of the
tibial diaphysis were calculated following four-point bending tests.Objectives
Methods
