The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial has recently demonstrated that surgery is non-superior to non-operative treatment in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to assess current surgical practice in the context of the PROFHER trial in terms of patient demographics, injury characteristics and the nature of the surgical treatment. A total of ten consecutive patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture from each of 11 United Kingdom hospitals were retrospectively identified over a 15 month period between January 2014 and March 2015. Data gathered for the 110 patients included patient demographics, injury characteristics, mode of surgical fixation, the grade of operating surgeon and the cost of the surgical implants.Objectives
Methods
The objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone
substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic
femoral heads during Pushout studies were performed with the dynamic hip screw (DHS)
and the DHS Blade in both cadaveric femoral heads and artificial
bone substitutes in the form of polyurethane foam blocks of different
density. The pushout studies were performed as a means of comparing
the force displacement curves produced by each implant within each
material.Introduction
Methods
Osteochondral injuries, if not treated adequately, often lead
to severe osteoarthritis. Possible treatment options include refixation
of the fragment or replacement therapies such as Pridie drilling,
microfracture or osteochondral grafts, all of which have certain
disadvantages. Only refixation of the fragment can produce a smooth
and resilient joint surface. The aim of this study was the evaluation
of an ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pin for the refixation of
osteochondral fragments under physiological conditions. In 16 Merino sheep, specific osteochondral fragments of the medial
femoral condyle were produced and refixed with one of conventional
bioresorbable pins, titanium screws or ultrasound-activated pins.
Macro- and microscopic scoring was undertaken after three months. Objectives
Methods
The use of two implants to manage concomitant ipsilateral femoral
shaft and proximal femoral fractures has been indicated, but no
studies address the relationship of dynamic hip screw (DHS) side
plate screws and the intramedullary nail where failure might occur
after union. This study compares different implant configurations
in order to investigate bridging the gap between the distal DHS
and tip of the intramedullary nail. A total of 29 left synthetic femora were tested in three groups:
1) gapped short nail (GSN); 2) unicortical short nail (USN), differing
from GSN by the use of two unicortical bridging screws; and 3) bicortical
long nail (BLN), with two angled bicortical and one unicortical bridging
screws. With these findings, five matched-pairs of cadaveric femora
were tested in two groups: 1) unicortical long nail (ULN), with
a longer nail than USN and three bridging unicortical screws; and
2) BLN. Specimens were axially loaded to 22.7 kg (50 lb), and internally
rotated 90°/sec until failure.Objectives
Methods
