Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 15 of 15
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 311 - 312
5 May 2023
Xu C Liu Y

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):311–312.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 3 | Pages 199 - 201
7 Mar 2023
Brzeszczyńska J Brzeszczyński F

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(3):199–201.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 10 | Pages 654 - 656
16 Oct 2023
Makaram NS Simpson AHRW

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(10):654–656.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 26 - 28
20 Jan 2022
Ma M Tan Z Li W Zhang H Liu Y Yue C


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 29 - 31
20 Jan 2022
Ma M Tan Z Li W Zhang H Liu Y Yue C


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 9 | Pages 571 - 573
2 Sep 2021
Beverly MC Murray DW


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 3 | Pages 188 - 191
1 Mar 2021
Nicholson T Scott A Newton Ede M Jones SW


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 12 | Pages 870 - 872
21 Dec 2020
Tsang SJ Simpson AHRW


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 134 - 136
1 Feb 2021
Im G

The high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs for OA, has provided a rationale for regenerative medicine as a possible treatment modality for OA treatment. In this editorial, the current status of regenerative medicine in OA including stem cells, exosomes, and genes is summarized along with the author’s perspectives. Despite a tremendous interest, so far there is very little evidence proving the efficacy of this modality for clinical application. As symptomatic relief is not sufficient to justify the high cost associated with regenerative medicine, definitive structural improvement that would last for years or decades and obviate or delay the need for joint arthroplasty is essential for regenerative medicine to retain a place among OA treatment methods.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):134–136.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 10 | Pages 469 - 471
1 Oct 2019
Evans CH


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 12 | Pages 636 - 638
1 Dec 2018
Roussot MA Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 3 | Pages 223 - 225
1 Mar 2018
Jones LD Golan D Hanna SA Ramachandran M


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 3 | Pages 92 - 94
1 Mar 2016
Murray IR LaPrade RF


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 3, Issue 3 | Pages 48 - 50
1 Mar 2014
Lidgren L Gomez-Barrena E N. Duda G Puhl W Carr A