Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR) is available as an alternative
option for younger, more active patients. There are failure modes
that are unique to MOMHR, which include loosening of the femoral
head and fractures of the femoral neck. Previous studies have speculated
that changes in the vascularity of the femoral head may contribute
to these failure modes. This study compares the survivorship between
the standard posterior approach (SPA) and modified posterior approach
(MPA) in MOMHR. A retrospective clinical outcomes study was performed examining
351 hips (279 male, 72 female) replaced with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
(BHR, Smith and Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) in 313 patients with
a pre-operative diagnosis of osteoarthritis. The mean follow-up
period for the SPA group was 2.8 years (0.1 to 6.1) and for the
MPA, 2.2 years (0.03 to 5.2); this difference in follow-up period
was statistically significant (p <
0.01). Survival analysis was
completed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Objectives
Methods
Our study aimed to examine if a mobile-bearing total knee replacement
(TKR) offered an advantage over fixed-bearing designs with respect
to rates of secondary resurfacing of the patella in knees in which
it was initially left unresurfaced. We examined the 11-year report of the New Zealand Joint Registry
and identified all primary TKR designs that had been implanted in
>
500 knees without primary resurfacing of the patella. We examined
how many of these were mobile-bearing, fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining
and fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised designs. We assessed the rates
of secondary resurfacing of the patella for each group and constructed
Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Objectives
Methods
