Fractures of the proximal femur are a common clinical problem, and a number of orthopaedic devices are available for the treatment of such fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the rotational stability, a common failure predictor, of three different rotational control design philosophies: a screw, a helical blade and a deployable crucifix. Devices were compared in terms of the mechanical work (W) required to rotate the implant by 6° in a bone substitute material. The substitute material used was Sawbones polyurethane foam of three different densities (0.08 g/cm3, 0.16 g/cm3 and 0.24 g/cm3). Each torsion test comprised a steady ramp of 1°/minute up to an angular displacement of 10°.Objectives
Methods
Because of the contradictory body of evidence related to the
potential benefits of helical blades in trochanteric fracture fixation,
we studied the effect of bone compaction resulting from the insertion
of a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). We developed a subject-specific computational model of a trochanteric
fracture (31-A2 in the AO classification) with lack of medial support
and varied the bone density to account for variability in bone properties
among hip fracture patients.Objectives
Methods
Introduction. The objective of this study was to determine if a synthetic bone
substitute would provide results similar to bone from osteoporotic
femoral heads during in vitro testing with orthopaedic
implants. If the synthetic material could produce results similar
to those of the osteoporotic bone, it could reduce or eliminate
the need for testing of implants on bone. Methods. Pushout studies were performed with the dynamic hip screw (DHS)
and the
