Arthritis of the wrist is a painful disabling
condition that has various causes and presentations. The traditional treatment
has been a total wrist fusion at a price of the elimination of movement.
However, forms of treatment which allow the preservation of movement
are now preferred. Modern arthroplasties of the wrist are still
not sufficiently robust to meet the demands of many patients, nor
do they restore normal kinematics of the wrist. A preferable compromise
may be selective excision and partial fusion of the wrist using
knowledge of the aetiology and pattern of degenerative change to
identify which joints can be sacrificed and which can be preserved. This article provides an overview of the treatment options available
for patients with arthritis of the wrist and an algorithm for selecting
an appropriate surgical strategy. Cite this article:
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis
to compare the efficacy of intermittent mechanical compression combined
with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, against either mechanical
compression or pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing deep-vein
thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing hip
or knee replacement. A total of six randomised controlled trials,
evaluating a total of 1399 patients, were identified. In knee arthroplasty,
the rate of DVT was reduced from 18.7% with anticoagulation alone
to 3.7% with combined modalities (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, p = 0.03;
number needed to treat: seven). There was moderate, albeit non-significant,
heterogeneity (I2 = 42%). In hip replacement, there was
a non-significant reduction in DVT from 8.7% with mechanical compression
alone to 7.2% with additional pharmacological prophylaxis (RRÂ 0.84)
and a significant reduction in DVT from 9.7% with anticoagulation
alone to 0.9% with additional mechanical compression (RR 0.17, p
<
0.001; number needed to treat: 12), with no heterogeneity (I2 =
0%). The included studies had insufficient power to demonstrate
an effect on pulmonary embolism. We conclude that the addition of intermittent mechanical leg
compression augments the efficacy of anticoagulation in preventing
DVT in patients undergoing both knee and hip replacement. Further
research on the role of combined modalities in thromboprophylaxis
in joint replacement and in other high-risk situations, such as fracture
of the hip, is warranted.
Thromboprophylaxis remains a controversial subject. A vast amount of epidemiological and trial data about venous thromboembolism has been published over the past 40 years. These data have been distilled and synthesised into guidelines designed to help the practitioner translate this extensive research into ‘evidence-based’ advice. Guidelines should, in theory, benefit patient care by ensuring that every patient routinely receives the best prophylaxis; without guidelines, it is argued, patients may fail to receive treatment or be exposed to protocols which are ineffective, dangerous or expensive. Guidelines, however, have not been welcomed or applied universally. In the United States, orthopaedic surgeons have published their concerns about the thromboprophylaxis guidelines prepared by the American College of Chest Physicians. In Britain, controversy persists with many surgeons unconvinced of the risk/benefit, cost/benefit or practicality of thromboprophylaxis. The extended remit of the recent National Institute of Clinical Excellence thromboprophylaxis guidelines has been challenged. The reasons for this disquiet are addressed in this paper and particular emphasis is placed on how clinically-acceptable guidelines could be developed and applied.
Little is known about the efficacy of graduated compression stockings in preventing venous thromboembolism after hip surgery. We conducted a prospective, randomised single-blind study to determine whether the addition of compression stockings to fondaparinux conferred any additional benefit. The study included 874 patients, of whom 795 could be evaluated (400 in the fondaparinux group and 395 in the fondaparinux plus compression stocking group). Fondaparinux was given post-operatively for five to nine days, either alone or combined with wearing stockings, which were worn for a mean 42 days (35 to 49). The study outcomes were venous thromboembolism, or sudden death before day 42. Duplex ultrasonography was scheduled within a week of day 42. Safety outcomes were bleeding and death from venous thromboembolism. The prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis was similar in the two groups 5.5% (22 of 400) in the fondaparinux group and 4.8 (19 of 395) in the fondaparinux plus stocking group (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 1.65, p = 0.69). Major bleeding occurred in only one patient. The addition of graduated compression stockings to fondaparinux appears to offer no additional benefit over the use of fondaparinux alone.
Patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement (THR and TKR, respectively) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism. We aimed to determine the time courses of both the incidence of venous thromboembolism and effective prophylaxis. Patients with elective primary THR and TKR were enrolled in the multi-national Global Orthopaedic Registry. Data on the incidence of venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis were collected from 6639 THR and 8326 TKR patients. The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism within three months of surgery was 1.7% in the THR and 2.3% in the TKR patients. The mean times to venous thromboembolism were 21.5 days ( The risk of venous thromboembolism extends beyond the usual period of hospitalisation, while the duration of prophylaxis is often shorter than this. Practices should be re-assessed to ensure that patients receive appropriate durations of prophylaxis.
Patients who undergo total knee replacement (TKR)are at high risk of venous thromboembolism. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the most suitable chemical prophylactic agents but there are some uncertainties about their safety and effectiveness. The foot pump offers an alternative. We randomised 229 patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKR to receive either the A-V Impulse foot pump or enoxaparin, a LMWH. Ascending venography was undertaken between the sixth and eighth postoperative day in 188 patients without knowledge of the randomisation category. The prevalence of venographic deep-vein thrombosis was 58% (57/99) in the foot-pump group and 54% (48/89) in the LMWH group which was not statistically significant. There were four cases of proximal thrombi and two of fatal pulmonary emboli in the foot-pump group and none in the LMWH group. There were fewer haemorrhagic complications and soft-tissue effects in the foot-pump group. We conclude that the neither method provides superior prophylaxis.
In previous randomised clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement, low-molecular-weight heparin has been given for an arbitrary 7 to 14 days. The risk factors are mainly perioperative and it is possible that a shorter course may be adequate. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of a three-day course. We assessed 156 primary THR patients after randomisation to either a control group or to receive enoxaparin at 12 hours preoperatively and 12 and 36 hours postoperatively. Thrombosis was diagnosed by routine venography. Haemorrhagic side-effects were assessed by measurement of blood loss, and soft-tissue side-effects by descriptive scores for wound discharge and bruising of the leg. The prevalence of calf thrombosis was 15.4% in the enoxaparin group and 32.1% in the control group (p = 0.01); the prevalence of proximal thrombosis was 15.4% and 17.9% respectively (not significant). There was no difference in haemorrhagic side-effects or wound discharge, but there was more bruising in the enoxaparin group.
