We studied whether the presence of lateral osteophytes
on plain radiographs was a predictor for the quality of cartilage
in the lateral compartment of patients with varus osteoarthritic
of the knee (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 to 3). The baseline MRIs of 344 patients from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
(OAI) who had varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee on hip-knee-ankle
radiographs were reviewed. Patients were categorised using the Osteoarthritis
Research Society International (OARSI) osteophyte grading system
into 174 patients with grade 0 (no osteophytes), 128 grade 1 (mild
osteophytes), 28 grade 2 (moderate osteophytes) and 14 grade 3 (severe
osteophytes) in the lateral compartment (tibia). All patients had
Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3 arthritis of the medial compartment.
The thickness and volume of the lateral cartilage and the percentage
of full-thickness cartilage defects in the lateral compartment was
analysed. There was no difference in the cartilage thickness or cartilage
volume between knees with osteophyte grades 0 to 3. The percentage
of full-thickness cartilage defects on the tibial side increased
from <
2% for grade 0 and 1 to 10% for grade 3. The lateral compartment cartilage volume and thickness is not
influenced by the presence of lateral compartment osteophytes in
patients with varus OA of the knee. Large lateral compartment osteophytes
(grade 3) increase the likelihood of full-thickness cartilage defects
in the lateral compartment. Cite this article:
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was
to identify any difference in femoral offset as measured on pre-operative
anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the pelvis, AP radiographs of
the hip and corresponding CT scans in a consecutive series of 100
patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip (43 men
and 57 women with a mean age of 61 years (45 to 74) and a mean body
mass index of 28 kg/m2 (20 to 45)). Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol
to achieve reproducible projection and all images were calibrated.
Inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated and agreement
between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. In the entire cohort, the mean femoral offset was 39.0 mm (95%
confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 40.6) on radiographs of the pelvis,
44.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 45.6) on radiographs of the hip and 44.7
mm (95% CI 43.5 to 45.9) on CT scans. AP radiographs of the pelvis
underestimated femoral offset by 13% when compared with CT (p <
0.001).
No difference in mean femoral offset was seen between AP radiographs
of the hip and CT (p = 0.191). Our results suggest that femoral offset is significantly underestimated
on AP radiographs of the pelvis but can be reliably and accurately
assessed on AP radiographs of the hip in patients with primary end-stage
hip osteoarthritis. We, therefore, recommend that additional AP radiographs of the
hip are obtained routinely for the pre-operative assessment of femoral
offset when templating before total hip replacement.
