We undertook a prospective, randomised study using a non-invasive transcranial Doppler device to evaluate cranial embolisation in computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty (n = 14) and compared this with a standard conventional surgical technique using intramedullary alignment guides (n = 10). All patients were selected randomly without the knowledge of the patient, anaesthetists (before the onset of the procedure) and ward staff. The operations were performed by a single surgeon at one hospital using a uniform surgical approach, instrumentation, technique and release sequence. The only variable in the two groups of patients was the use of single tracker pins of the imageless navigation system in the tibia and femur of the navigated group and intramedullary femoral and tibial alignment jigs in the non-navigated group.

Acetabular Doppler signals were obtained in 14 patients in the computer-assisted group and nine (90%) in the conventional group, in whom high-intensity signals were detected in seven computer-assisted patients (50%) and in all of the non-navigated patients.

In the computer-assisted group no patient had more than two detectable emboli, with a mean of 0.64 (SD 0.74). In the non-navigated group the number of emboli ranged from one to 43 and six patients had more than two detectable emboli, with a mean of 10.7 (sd 13.5). The difference between the two groups was highly significant using the Wilcoxon non-parametric test (p = 0.0003).

Our findings show that computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty, when compared with conventional jig-based surgery, significantly reduces systemic emboli as detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.

We carried out a prospective randomised study to evaluate the blood loss in 60 patients having a total knee arthroplasty and divided randomly into two equal groups, one having a computer-assisted procedure and the other a standard operation. The surgery was carried out by a single surgeon at one institution using a uniform approach. The only variable in the groups was the use of intramedullary femoral and tibial alignment jigs in the standard group and single tracker pins of the imageless navigation system in the tibia and femur in the navigated group.

The mean drainage of blood was 1351 ml (715 to 2890; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1183 to 1518) in the computer-aided group and 1747 ml (1100 to 3030; CI 1581 to 1912) in the conventional group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). The mean calculated loss of haemoglobin was 36 g/dl in the navigated group versus 53 g/dl in the conventional group; this was significant at p < 0.00001.

There was a highly significant reduction in blood drainage and the calculated Hb loss between the computer-assisted and the conventional techniques. This allows the ordering of less blood before the operation, reduces risks at transfusion and gives financial saving. Computer-assisted surgery may also be useful for patients in whom blood products are not acceptable.