The aim of this study was to compare the migration of the femoral component, five years postoperatively, between patients with a highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) insert and those with a conventional polyethylene (PE) insert in an uncemented Triathlon fixed insert cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims included clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We have previously reported the migration and outcome of the tibial components in these patients. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted including 96 TKAs. The migration of the femoral component was measured with radiostereometry (RSA) at three and six months and one, two, and five years postoperatively. PROMs were collected preoperatively and at all periods of follow-up.Aims
Methods
The primary objective of this study was to compare the five-year tibial component migration and wear between highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) inserts and conventional polyethylene (PE) inserts of the uncemented Triathlon fixed insert cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary objectives included clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A double-blinded, randomized study was conducted including 96 TKAs. Tibial component migration and insert wear were measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at three, six, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. PROMS were collected preoperatively and at all follow-up timepoints.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
natural history of rheumatoid disease of the shoulder over an eight-year
period. Our hypothesis was that progression of the disease is associated
with a decrease in function with time. A total of 22 patients (44 shoulders; 17 women, 5 men, (mean
age 63)) with rheumatoid arthritis were followed for eight years.
All shoulders were assessed using the Constant score, anteroposterior
radiographs (Larsen score, Upward-Migration-Index (UMI)) and ultrasound
(US). At final follow-up, the Short Form-36, disabilities of the
arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) Score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate
and use of anti-rheumatic medication were determined. The mean Constant score was 72 points (50 to 88) at baseline
and 69 points (25 to 100) at final follow-up. Radiological evaluation
showed progressive destruction of the peri-articular structures
with time. This progression of joint and rotator cuff destruction
was significantly associated with the Constant score. However, at
baseline only the extent of rotator cuff disease and the UMI could
predict the Constant score at final follow-up. A plain anteroposterior radiograph of the shoulder is sufficient
to assess any progression of rheumatoid disease and to predict functional
outcome in the long term by using the UMI as an indicator of rotator
cuff degeneration. Cite this article:
Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement (TKR)
was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of
polyethylene inserts. However, no consistent clinical advantages
of mobile- over fixed-bearing (FB) TKR have been found. In this
study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over
fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome
scores. Furthermore, we determined which modifying variables affected
the outcome. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to collect
clinical trials comparing MB and FB in primary TKR. The primary
outcomes were revision rates for any reason, aseptic loosening and
wear. Secondary outcomes included range of movement, Knee Society
score (KSS), Oxford knee score (OKS), Short-Form 12 (SF-12) score
and radiological parameters. Meta-regression techniques were used
to explore factors modifying the observed effect. Our search yielded 1827 publications, of which 41 studies met
our inclusion criteria, comprising over 6000 TKRs. Meta-analyses
showed no clinically relevant differences in terms of revision rates,
clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between
MB and FB TKRs. It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority
of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice. Cite this article:
We welcome letters to the Editor concerning articles
that have recently been published. Such letters will be subject
to the usual stages of selection and editing; where appropriate the
authors of the original article will be offered the opportunity
to reply.
This single-blinded randomised controlled trial
investigated whether one design of mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement
(TKR) has any advantage over a fixed-bearing (FB) design on long-term
fixation as measured by radiostereometry. The amount of wear underneath
the mobile bearing was also evaluated. A series of 42 knees was randomised
to MB or FB tibial components with appropriate polyethylene inserts
and followed for between ten and 12 years, or until the death of
the patient. The polyethylene in the MB group was superior in that
it was gamma-irradiated in inert gas and was calcium-stearate free;
the polyethylene in the FB group was gamma-irradiated in air and
contained calcium stearate. In theory this should be advantageous
to the wear rate of the MB group. At final follow-up the overall
mean migration was 0.75 mm ( For the MB group, the mean linear wear rate on the under-surface
was 0.026 mm/year (