Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
The Bone & Joint Journal
Dates
Year From

Year To
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 76-B, Issue 5 | Pages 848 - 849
1 Sep 1994
Adeniran A Merriam W


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 68-B, Issue 5 | Pages 708 - 713
1 Nov 1986
Merriam W Taylor T Ruff S McPhail M

A review of 77 patients with traumatic central cord syndrome revealed that atypical variations are more common than the existing literature suggests and that these may be seen in a wide variety of acute injuries to the cervical spine. In general the outcome is good; a favourable prognosis on admission is suggested by good hand function, hyperpathia, Lhermitte's sign and normal perianal sensation. The study has highlighted the value of regular muscle charting and has cast doubt on previous neuroanatomical assumptions about the syndrome.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 65-B, Issue 3 | Pages 326 - 328
1 May 1983
Merriam W Porter K

One hundred patients who had sustained a fracture of the tibial shaft and had been treated by internal fixation were reviewed to obtain information on residual ankle and subtalar disability. This study reinforces the belief that early mobilisation of patients with tibial shaft fractures does help to preserve subtalar movement.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 65-B, Issue 2 | Pages 153 - 156
1 Mar 1983
Merriam W Burwell R Mulholland R Pearson J Webb J

Modern anthropometric techniques were used to investigate two groups of subjects, one with various syndromes associated with pain in the lower back and the other a control group. Analysis confirmed previous reports that people prone to pain in the back have a greater standing height than people who are not. To investigate this further two new components of height, namely pelvic height and suprapelvic height, were calculated in addition to the established calculation of subischial height. Consecutive components, namely suprapelvic height, pelvic height and subischial height, together constituted the standing height of a subject. The main finding of this investigation was that the relatively large standing height of the subject prone to back pain was due only to the pelvic component.