Valid and reliable techniques for assessing performance
are essential to surgical education, especially with the emergence
of competency-based frameworks. Despite this, there is a paucity
of adequate tools for the evaluation of skills required during joint
replacement surgery. In this scoping review, we examine current
methods for assessing surgeons’ competency in joint replacement
procedures in both simulated and clinical environments. The ability
of many of the tools currently in use to make valid, reliable and
comprehensive assessments of performance is unclear. Furthermore,
many simulation-based assessments have been criticised for a lack
of transferability to the clinical setting. It is imperative that
more effective methods of assessment are developed and implemented
in order to improve our ability to evaluate the performance of skills
relating to total joint replacement. This will enable educators
to provide formative feedback to learners throughout the training
process to ensure that they have attained core competencies upon
completion of their training. This should help ensure positive patient
outcomes as the surgical trainees enter independent practice. Cite this article:
