Salter innominate osteotomy is an effective reconstructive
procedure for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip
(DDH), but some children have a poor outcome at skeletal maturity.
In order to investigate factors associated with an unfavourable
outcome, we assessed the development of the contralateral hip. We retrospectively
reviewed 46 patients who underwent a unilateral Salter osteotomy
at between five and seven years of age, with a mean follow-up of
10.3 years (7 to 20). The patients were divided into three groups
according to the centre–edge angle (CEA) of the contralateral hip
at skeletal maturity: normal (>
25°, 22 patients), borderline (20°
to 25°, 17 patients) and dysplastic (<
20°, 7 patients). The
CEA of the affected hip was measured pre-operatively, at eight to
nine years of age, at 11 to 12 years of age and at skeletal maturity.
The CEA of the affected hip was significantly smaller in the borderline
and dysplastic groups at 11 and 12 years of age (p = 0.012) and
at skeletal maturity (p = 0.017) than in the normal group. Severin
group III was seen in two (11.8%) and four hips (57.1%) of the borderline
and dysplastic groups, respectively (p <
0.001). Limited individual development of the acetabulum was associated
with an unfavourable outcome following Salter osteotomy. Cite this article:
We reviewed 98 children (133 hips) with developmental dysplasia of the hip who underwent arthrography immediately after closed reduction by overhead traction. We followed the patients to skeletal maturity to investigate whether soft-tissue interposition influences acetabular development and avascular necrosis over the long term. The shape of the limbus and the thickness of the soft-tissue interposition at the acetabular floor, as shown on arthrograms at the time of reduction, were not directly related to the final radiological results or to the incidence of avascular necrosis. Even if marked soft-tissue interposition was found on the initial arthrogram, spontaneous disappearance was noted in 71% up to the age of five years. The final radiological results showed no difference between those in which the interposition disappeared and those with none at the time of closed reduction. However, the requirement for secondary surgery at the age of five years was significantly higher in those with more than 3.5 mm of soft-tissue interposition. In the no-disappearance group (group C) further operation was necessary in 100% and the results were significantly worse at maturity according to Severin’s classification. We suggest that the indications for open reduction should not be based solely on the arthrographic findings at the time of closed reduction.
