To evaluate the rate of dislocation following dual mobility total hip arthroplasty (DM-THA) in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, and to compare rates of dislocation, surgical-site infection, reoperation, and one-year mortality between DM-THA and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA). Studies were selected based on the following criteria: 1) study design (retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, retrospective comparative studies, prospective comparative studies, and randomized controlled studies (RCTs)); 2) study population (patients with femoral neck fracture); 3) intervention (DM-THA or BHA); and 4) outcomes (complications during postoperative follow-up and clinical results). Pooled meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the dislocation rate after DM-THA and to compare outcomes between DM-THA and BHA.Aims
Methods
Pre-operative planning for total hip replacement
(THR) is challenging in hips with severe acetabular deformities, including
those with a hypoplastic acetabulum or severe defects and in the
presence of arthrodesis or ankylosis. We evaluated whether a Rapid
Prototype (RP) model, which is a life-sized reproduction based on
three-dimensional CT scans, can determine the feasibility of THR
and provide information about the size and position of the acetabular component
in severe acetabular deformities. THR was planned using an RP model
in 21 complex hips in five men (five hips) and 16 women (16 hips)
with a mean age of 47.7 years (24 to 70) at operation. An acetabular
component was implanted successfully and THR completed in all hips.
The acetabular component used was within 2 mm of the predicted size
in 17 hips (80.9%). All of the acetabular components and femoral
stems had radiological evidence of bone ingrowth and stability at
the final follow-up, without any detectable wear or peri-prosthetic
osteolysis. The RP model allowed a simulated procedure pre-operatively
and was helpful in determining the feasibility of THR pre-operatively,
and to decide on implant type, size and position in complex THRs. Cite this article:
This prospective multicentre study was undertaken
to determine whether the timing of the post-operative administration
of bisphosphonate affects fracture healing and the rate of complication
following an intertrochanteric fracture. Between August 2008 and
December 2009, 90 patients with an intertrochanteric fracture who
underwent internal fixation were randomised to three groups according
to the timing of the commencement of risedronate treatment after
surgery: Group A (from one week after surgery), Group B (from one
month after surgery), and Group C (from three months after surgery).
The radiological time to fracture healing was assessed as the primary
endpoint, and the incidence of complications, including excessive
displacement or any complication requiring revision surgery, as
the secondary endpoint. The mean time to fracture healing post-operatively
in groups A, B and C was 10.7 weeks ( This study demonstrates that the timing of the post-operative
administration of bisphosphonates does not appear to affect the
rate of healing of an intertrochanteric fracture or the incidence
of complications.
A variety of radiological methods of measuring
version of the acetabular component after total hip replacement (THR)
have been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability
and validity of six methods (those of Lewinnek; Widmer; Hassan et
al; Ackland, Bourne and Uhthoff; Liaw et al; and Woo and Morrey)
that are currently in use. In 36 consecutive patients who underwent
THR, version of the acetabular component was measured by three independent
examiners on plain radiographs using these six methods and compared
with measurements using CT scans. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities
of each measurement were estimated. All measurements on both radiographs
and CT scans had excellent intra- and interobserver reliability
and the results from each of the six methods correlated well with
the CT measurements. However, measurements made using the methods
of Widmer and of Ackland, Bourne and Uhthoff were significantly
different from the CT measurements (both p <
0.001), whereas
measurements made using the remaining four methods were similar
to the CT measurements. With regard to reliability and convergent
validity, we recommend the use of the methods described by Lewinnek,
Hassan et al, Liaw et al and Woo and Morrey for measurement of version
of the acetabular component.