The AO Foundation advocates the use of partially
threaded lag screws in the fixation of fractures of the medial malleolus.
However, their threads often bypass the radiodense physeal scar
of the distal tibia, possibly failing to obtain more secure purchase
and better compression of the fracture. We therefore hypothesised that the partially threaded screws
commonly used to fix a medial malleolar fracture often provide suboptimal
compression as a result of bypassing the physeal scar, and proposed
that better compression of the fracture may be achieved with shorter
partially threaded screws or fully threaded screws whose threads
engage the physeal scar. We analysed compression at the fracture site in human cadaver
medial malleoli treated with either 30 mm or 45 mm long partially
threaded screws or 45 mm fully threaded screws. The median compression
at the fracture site achieved with 30 mm partially threaded screws
(0.95 kg/cm2 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.8 to 1.2) and
45 mm fully threaded screws
(1.0 kg/cm2 (IQR 0.7 to 2.8)) was significantly higher
than that achieved with 45 mm partially threaded screws (0.6 kg/cm2 (IQR
0.2 to 0.9)) (p = 0.04 and p <
0.001, respectively). The fully
threaded screws and the 30mm partially threaded screws were seen
to engage the physeal scar under an image intensifier in each case. The results support the use of 30 mm partially threaded or 45
mm fully threaded screws that engage the physeal scar rather than
longer partially threaded screws that do not. A
45 mm fully threaded screw may in practice offer additional benefit
over 30 mm partially threaded screws in increasing the thread count
in the denser paraphyseal region. Cite this article:
Injection or aspiration of the ankle may be performed through either an anteromedial or an anterolateral approach for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons. We evaluated the success of an intra-articular puncture in relation to its site in 76 ankles from 38 cadavers. Two orthopaedic surgical trainees each injected methylene blue dye into 18 of 38 ankles through an anterolateral approach and into 20 of 38 through an anteromedial. An arthrotomy was then performed to confirm the placement of the dye within the joint. Of the anteromedial injections 31 of 40 (77.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 64.6 to 90.4) were successful as were 31 of 36 (86.1%, 95% CI 74.8 to 97.4) anterolateral injections. In total 62 of 76 (81.6%, 95% CI 72.9 to 90.3) of the injections were intra-articular with a trend towards greater accuracy with the anterolateral approach, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.25). In the case of trainee A, 16 of 20 anteromedial injections and 14 of 18 anterolateral punctures were intra-articular. Trainee B made successful intra-articular punctures in 15 of 20 anteromedial and 17 of 18 anterolateral approaches. There was no significant difference between them (p = 0.5 and p = 0.16 for the anteromedial and anterolateral approaches, respectively). These results were similar to those of other reported studies. Unintended peri-articular injection can cause complications and an unsuccessful aspiration can delay diagnosis. Placement of the needle may be aided by the use of ultrasonographic scanning or fluoroscopy which may be required in certain instances.
Intra-articular punctures and injections are performed routinely on patients with injuries to and chronic diseases of joints, to release an effusion or haemarthrosis, or to inject drugs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of placement of the needle during this procedure. A total of 76 cadaver acromioclavicular joints were injected with a solution containing methyl blue and subsequently dissected to distinguish intra- from peri-articular injection. In order to assess the importance of experience in achieving accurate placement, half of the injections were performed by an inexperienced resident and half by a skilled specialist. The specialist injected a further 20 cadaver acromioclavicular joints with the aid of an image intensifier. The overall frequency of peri-articular injection was much higher than expected at 43% (33 of 76) overall, with 42% (16 of 38) by the specialist and 45% (17 of 38) by the resident. The specialist entered the joint in all 20 cases when using the image intensifier. Correct positioning of the needle in the joint should be facilitated by fluoroscopy, thereby guaranteeing an intra-articular injection.