The purpose of this study was to assess mid-term survivorship following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with Optetrak Logic components and identify the most common revision indications at a single institution. We identified a retrospective cohort of 7,941 Optetrak primary TKAs performed from January 2010 to December 2018. We reviewed the intraoperative findings of 369 TKAs that required revision TKA from January 2010 to December 2021 and the details of the revision implants used. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the impact of patient variables and year of implantation on survival time.Aims
Methods
Many patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have severe osteoarthritis (OA) in both knees and may consider either simultaneous or staged bilateral TKA. The implications of simultaneous versus staged bilateral TKA for return to work are not well understood. We hypothesized that employed patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA would have significantly fewer days missed from work compared with the sum of days missed from each operation for patients who underwent staged bilateral TKA. The prospective arthroplasty registry at the Hospital for Special Surgery was used. Baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcome scores were evaluated. We used a linear regression model, adjusting for potential confounding variables including age, sex, preoperative BMI, and type of work (sedentary, moderate, high activity, or strenuous), to analyze time lost from work after simultaneous compared with staged bilateral TKA.Aims
Methods
Blood loss during total knee replacement (TKR)
remains a significant concern. In this study, 114 patients underwent TKR,
and were divided into two groups based on whether they received
a new generation fibrin sealant intra-operatively, or a local infiltration
containing adrenaline. Groups were then compared for mean calculated
total blood volume (TBV) loss, transfusion rates, and knee range
of movement. Mean TBV loss was similar between groups: fibrin sealant
mean was 705 ml (281 to 1744), local adrenaline mean was 712 ml
(261 to 2308) (p = 0.929). Overall, significantly fewer units of
blood were transfused in the fibrin sealant group (seven units)
compared with the local adrenaline group (15 units) (p = 0.0479).
Per patient transfused, significantly fewer units of blood were transfused
in the fibrin sealant group (1.0 units) compared with the local
adrenaline group (1.67 units) (p = 0.027), suggesting that the fibrin
sealant may reduce the need for multiple unit transfusions. Knee
range of movement was similar between groups. From our results,
it appears that application of this newer fibrin sealant results
in blood loss and transfusion rates that are low and similar to
previously applied fibrin sealants. Cite this article:
