The aim of this study was to identify predictors of return to
work (RTW) after revision lower limb arthroplasty in patients of
working age in the United Kingdom. We assessed 55 patients aged ≤ 65 years after revision total
hip arthroplasty (THA). There were 43 women and 12 men with a mean
age of 54 years (23 to 65). We also reviewed 30 patients after revision
total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 14 women and 16 men with
a mean age of 58 years (48 to 64). Preoperatively, age, gender,
body mass index, social deprivation, mode of failure, length of
primary implant survival, work status and nature, activity level
(University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score), and Oxford
Hip and Knee Scores were recorded. Postoperatively, RTW status,
Oxford Hip and Knee Scores, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), UCLA score, and
Work, Osteoarthritis and Joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ)
scores were obtained. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
We investigated changes in the axial alignment of the ipsilateral
hip and knee after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed 152 patients undergoing primary THA (163 hips; 22
hips in men, 141 hips in women) without a pre-operative flexion
contracture. The mean age was 64 years (30 to 88). The diagnosis
was osteoarthritis (OA) in 151 hips (primary in 18 hips, and secondary
to dysplasia in 133) and non-OA in 12 hips. A posterolateral approach
with repair of the external rotators was used in 134 hips and an
anterior approach in 29 hips. We measured changes in leg length
and offset on radiographs, and femoral anteversion, internal rotation
of the hip and lateral patellar tilt on CT scans, pre- and post-operatively. Aims
Patients and Methods
Obtaining a balanced flexion gap with correct
femoral component rotation is one of the prerequisites for a successful
outcome after total knee replacement (TKR). Different techniques
for achieving this have been described. In this study we prospectively
compared gap-balancing Both groups systematically reproduced a similar external rotation
of the femoral component relative to the surgical transepicondylar
axis: 2.4°
We have investigated the accuracy of the templating of digital radiographs in planning total hip replacement using two common object-based calibration methods with the ball placed laterally (method 1) or medially (method 2) and compared them with two non-object-based methods. The latter comprised the application of a fixed magnification of 121% (method 3) and calculation of magnification based on the object-film-distance (method 4). We studied the post-operative radiographs of 57 patients (19 men, 38 women, mean age 73 years (53 to 89)) using the measured diameter of the prosthetic femoral head and comparing it with the true value. Both object-based methods (1 and 2) produced large errors (mean/maximum: 2.55%/17.4% and 2.04%/6.46%, respectively). Method 3 applying a fixed magnification and method 4 (object-film-distance) produced smaller errors (mean/maximum 1.42%/5.22% and 1.57%/4.24%, respectively; p <
0.01). The latter results were clinically relevant and acceptable when planning was allowed to within one implant size. Object-based calibration (methods 1 and 2) has fundamental problems with the correct placement of the calibration ball. The accuracy of the fixed magnification (method 3) matched that of object-film-distance (method 4) and was the most reliable and efficient calibration method in digital templating.
Although the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
(WOMAC) osteoarthritis index was originally developed for the assessment
of non-operative treatment, it is commonly used to evaluate patients
undergoing either total hip (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).
We assessed the importance of the 17 WOMAC function items from the perspective
of 1198 patients who underwent either THR (n = 704) or TKR (n =
494) in order to develop joint-specific short forms. After these
patients were administered the WOMAC pre-operatively and at three,
six, 12 and 24 months’ follow-up, they were asked to nominate an
item of the function scale that was most important to them. The
items chosen were significantly different between patients undergoing
THR and those undergoing TKR (p <
0.001), and there was a shift
in the priorities after surgery in both groups. Setting a threshold
for prioritised items of ≥ 5% across all follow-up, eight items
were selected for THR and seven for TKR, of which six items were
common to both. The items comprising specific WOMAC-THR and TKR
function short forms were found to be equally responsive compared
with the original WOMAC function form. Cite this article:
