The biomechanical function of the anteromedial
(AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament
(ACL) remains controversial. Some studies report that the AM bundle
stabilises the knee joint in anteroposterior (AP) translation and
rotational movement (both internal and external) to the same extent
as the PL bundle. Others conclude that the PL bundle is more important
than the AM in controlling rotational movement. The objective of this randomised cohort study involving 60 patients
(39 men and 21 women) with a mean age of 32.9 years (18 to 53) was
to evaluate the function of the AM and the PL bundles of the ACL
in both AP and rotational movements of the knee joint after single-bundle
and double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a computer navigation
system. In the double-bundle group the patients were also randomised
to have the AM or the PL bundle tensioned first, with knee laxity
measured after each
Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the outcomes of revision
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the use
of different types of graft. A search was performed of Medline and Pubmed using the terms
“Anterior Cruciate Ligament” and “ACL” combined with “revision”,
“re-operation” and “failure”. Only studies that reported the outcome
at a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Two authors reviewed
the papers, and outcomes were subdivided into autograft and allograft. Autograft
was subdivided into hamstring (HS) and bone-patellar tendon-bone
(BPTB). Subjective and objective outcome measures were analysed
and odds ratios with confidence intervals were calculated.Aims
Materials and Methods
Improvements in the surgical technique of total
knee replacement (TKR) are continually being sought. There has recently
been interest in three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning using
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT. The 3D images are increasingly
used for the production of patient-specific models, surgical guides
and custom-made implants for TKR. The users of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) claim that
they allow the optimum balance of technology and conventional surgery
by reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing
tools. In this way the advantages of accuracy and precision claimed
by computer navigation techniques are achieved without the disadvantages
of additional intra-operative inventory, new skills or surgical
time. This review describes the terminology used in this area and debates
the advantages and disadvantages of PSI.
We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 68 patients who had been referred with an injury to the posterolateral corner of the knee to a specialist knee surgeon between 2005 and 2009. These injuries were diagnosed based on a combination of clinical testing and imaging and arthroscopy when available. In all, 51 patients (75%) presented within 24 hours of their injury with a mean presentation at eight days (0 to 20) after the injury. A total of 63 patients (93%) had instability of the knee at presentation. There was a mean delay to the diagnosis of injury to the posterolateral corner of 30 months (0 to 420) from the time of injury. In all, the injuries in 49 patients (72%) were not identified at the time of the initial presentation, with the injury to the posterolateral corner only recognised in those patients who had severe multiple ligamentous injuries. The correct diagnosis, including injury to the posterolateral corner, had only been made in 34 patients (50%) at time of referral to a specialist knee clinic. MRI correctly identified 14 of 15 injuries when performed acutely (within 12 weeks of injury), but this was the case in only four of 15 patients in whom it was performed more than 12 weeks after the injury. Our study highlights a need for greater diligence in the examination and investigation of acute ligamentous injuries at the knee with symptoms of instability, in order to avoid failure to identify the true extent of the injury at the time when anatomical repair is most straightforward.
