The aim of this study was to give estimates of the incidence of component incompatibility in hip and knee arthroplasty and to test the effect of an online, real-time compatibility check. Intraoperative barcode registration of arthroplasty implants was introduced in Denmark in 2013. We developed a compatibility database and, from May 2017, real-time compatibility checking was implemented and became part of the registration. We defined four classes of component incompatibility: A-I, A-II, B-I, and B-II, depending on an assessment of the level of risk to the patient (A/B), and on whether incompatibility was knowingly accepted (I/II).Aims
Materials and Methods
Valgus knee deformity can present a number of
unique surgical challenges for the total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
surgeon. Understanding the typical patterns of bone and soft-tissue pathology
in the valgus arthritic knee is critical for appropriate surgical
planning. This review aims to provide the knee arthroplasty surgeon
with an understanding of surgical management strategies for the
treatment of valgus knee arthritis. Lateral femoral and tibial deficiencies, contracted lateral soft
tissues, attenuated medial soft tissues, and multiplanar deformities
may all be present in the valgus arthritic knee. A number of classifications
have been reported in order to guide surgical management, and a variety
of surgical strategies have been described with satisfactory clinical
results. Depending on the severity of the deformity, a variety of
TKA implant designs may be appropriate for use. Regardless of an operating surgeon’s preferred surgical strategy,
adherence to a step-wise approach to deformity correction is advised. Cite this article:
The lateral subvastus approach combined with an osteotomy of the tibial tubercle is a recognised, but rarely used approach for total knee replacement (TKR). A total of 32 patients undergoing primary TKR was randomised into two groups, in one of which the lateral subvastus approach combined with a tibial tubercle osteotomy and in the other the medial parapatellar approach were used. The patients were assessed radiologically and clinically using measurement of the range of movement, a visual analogue patient satisfaction score, the Western Ontario McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index and the American Knee Society score. Four patients were lost to the complete follow-up at two years. At two years there were no significant differences between the groups in any of the parameters for clinical outcome. In the lateral approach group there was one complication due to displacement of the tibial tubercle osteotomy and two osteotomies took more than six months to unite. In the medial approach group, one patient had a partial tear of the quadriceps. There was a significantly greater incidence of lateral patellar subluxation in the medial approach group (3 of 12) compared with the lateral approach group (0 of 16) (p = 0.034), but without any apparent clinical detriment. We conclude that the lateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy is a safe technique with an outcome comparable with that of the medial parapatellar approach for TKR, but the increased surgical time and its specific complications do not support its routine use. It would seem to be more appropriate to reserve this technique for patients in whom problems with patellar tracking are anticipated.
