Aims. The aims of this study were to assess quality of life after hip fractures, to characterize respondents to patient-reported
Aims. The aims of this study were to determine if an increasing serum cobalt (Co) and/or chromium (Cr) concentration is correlated with a decreasing Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients who received the Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), and to evaluate the ten-year revision rate and show if sex, inclination angle, and Co level influenced the revision rate. Methods. A total of 62 patients with an ASR-HRA were included and monitored yearly postoperatively. At follow-up, serum Co and Cr levels were measured and the HHS and the HOOS were scored. In addition, preoperative patient and implant variables and the need for revision surgery were recorded. We used a linear mixed model to relate the serum Co and Cr levels to different patient-reported
Aims. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and outcomes in terms of patient-reported
Aims. Although periacetabular osteotomies are widely used for the treatment of symptomatic dysplastic hips, long-term surgical outcomes and patient-reported
Orthopaedic
Aims. The aim of this study was to record the incidence of post-traumatic
osteoarthritis (OA), the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA),
and patient-reported
Aims. It is not known whether change in patient-reported
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between hip shape and mid-term function in Perthes’ disease. It also explored whether the modified three-group Stulberg classification can offer similar prognostic information to the five-group system. A total of 136 individuals aged 12 years or older who had Perthes’ disease in childhood completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Mobility score (function), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) (function), EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) score (quality of life), and the numeric rating scale for pain (NRS). The Stulberg class of the participants’ hip radiographs were evaluated by three fellowship-trained paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Hip shape and Stulberg class were compared to PROM scores.Aims
Methods
Aims. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the improvement in patient-reported
Following arthroplasty of the knee, the patient’s
perception of improvement in symptoms is fundamental to the assessment
of outcome. Better clinical outcome may offset the inferior survival
observed for some types of implant. By examining linked National
Joint Registry (NJR) and patient-reported
To calculate how the likelihood of obtaining measurable benefit from hip or knee arthroplasty varies with preoperative patient-reported scores. Existing UK data from 222,933 knee and 209,760 hip arthroplasty patients were used to model an individual’s probability of gaining meaningful improvement after surgery based on their preoperative Oxford Knee or Hip Score (OKS/OHS). A clinically meaningful improvement after arthroplasty was defined as ≥ 8 point improvement in OHS, and ≥ 7 in OKS.Aims
Methods
Aims. In this prospective observational study, we investigated the
time-dependent changes and correlations of upper arm performance
tests (ten-second test and Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function
(STEF), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the
JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in 31
patients with cervical myelopathy who had undergone surgery. . Patients and Methods. We hypothesised that all the indices correlate with each other,
but show slightly different recovery patterns, and that the newly
described JOACMEQ is a sensitive
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported
To assess how the cost-effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) varies with age, sex, and preoperative Oxford Hip or Knee Score (OHS/OKS); and to identify the patient groups for whom THA/TKA is cost-effective. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model from a United Kingdom NHS perspective, informed by published analyses of patient-level data. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of THA and TKA in adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis compared with having no arthroplasty surgery during the ten-year time horizon.Aims
Methods
Aims. Little is known about the relative outcomes of revision of unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare the
outcomes of revision surgery for the two procedures in terms of
complications, re-revision and patient-reported
We have compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in three distinct diagnostic groups, using survival analysis as used by the United Kingdom national joint registers, patient-reported
National registers compare implants by their revision rates, but the validity of the method has never been assessed. The New Zealand Joint Registry publishes clinical outcomes (Oxford knee scores, OKS) alongside revision rates, allowing comparison of the two measurements. In the two types of knee replacement, unicompartmental (UKR) had a better knee score than total replacement (TKR), but the revision rate of the former was nearly three times higher than that of the latter. This was because the sensitivity of the revision rate to clinical failure was different for the two implants. For example, of knees with a very poor outcome (OKS <
20 points), only about 12% of TKRs were revised compared with about 63% of UKRs with similar scores. Revision therefore is not an objective measurement and should not be used to compare these two types of implant. Furthermore, revision is much less sensitive than the OKS to clinical failure in both types and therefore exaggerates the success of knee replacements, particularly of TKR.
We present a comparison of patient-reported outcomes
(PROMs) in relation to patient age, in patients who had received
a total (TKR) or unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The outcome
was evaluated using the Oxford knee score (OKS), EuroQol (EQ-5D)
and satisfaction scores. Patients aged 65 to 84 years demonstrated
better pre-operative function scores than those aged <
65 years
(OKS, p = 0.03; EQ-5D, p = 0.048) and those aged
≥ 85 years (OKS, p = 0.03). Post-operative scores were comparable
across age groups, but a linear trend for greater post-operative
improvement in OKS and EQ-5D was seen with decreasing age (p <
0.033). The overall mean satisfaction score at six months was 84.9,
but those aged <
55 years exhibited a lower mean level of satisfaction (78.3)
compared with all other age groups (all p <
0.031). The cumulative
overall two-year revision rate was 1.3%. This study demonstrates
that good early outcomes, as measured by the OKS and EQ-5D, can
be anticipated following knee replacement regardless of the patient’s
age, although younger patients gain greater improvement. However,
the lower satisfaction in those aged
<
55 years is a concern, and suggests that outcome is not fully
encapsulated by the OKS and EQ-5D evaluation, and raises the question
whether the OKS alone is an appropriate measure of pain and function
in younger, more active individuals. Cite this article:
The practice of alternating operating theatres has long been used to reduce surgeon idle time between cases. However, concerns have been raised as to the safety of this practice. We assessed the payments and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed during overlapping and nonoverlapping days, also comparing the total number of the surgeon’s cases and the total time spent in the operating theatre per day. A retrospective analysis was performed on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Limited Data Set (LDS) on all primary elective TKAs performed at the New England Baptist Hospital between January 2013 and June 2016. Using theatre records, episodes were categorized into days where a surgeon performed overlapping and nonoverlapping lists. Clinical outcomes, economic outcomes, and demographic factors were calculated. A regression model controlling for the patient-specific factors was used to compare groups. Total orthopaedic cases and aggregate time spent operating (time between skin incision and closure) were also compared.Aims
Materials and Methods