We conducted an anatomical study to determine
the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN)
for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar
nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms.
The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer
were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination
in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through
the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial
branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also
assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the
mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to
106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally
when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore
conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the
deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately
30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the
point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve
the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article:
We report a new surgical technique for the treatment
of traumatic dislocation of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint of the
thumb. This is a tenodesis which uses part of the flexor carpi radialis. Between January 2010 and August 2013, 13 patients with traumatic
instability of the CMC joint of the thumb were treated using this
technique. The mean time interval between injury and ligament reconstruction
was 13 days (0 to 42). The mean age of the patients at surgery was
38 years: all were male. At a mean final follow-up of 26 months (24 to 29), no patient
experienced any residual instability. The mean total palmar abduction
of the CMC joint of the thumb was 61° and the mean radial abduction
65° The mean measurements for the uninjured hand were 66° (60° to
73°) and 68° (60° to 75°), respectively. The mean Kapandji thumb
opposition score was 8.5° (8° to 9°). The mean pinch and grip strengths
of the hand were 6.7 kg (3.4 to 8.2) and 40 kg (25 to 49), respectively.
The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire
score was 3 (1 to 6). Based on the Smith and Cooney score, we obtained
a mean score of 85 (75 to 95), which included four excellent, seven
good, and two fair results. Our technique offers an alternative method of treating traumatic
dislocation of the CMC joint of the thumb: it produces a stable
joint and acceptable hand function. Cite this article:
Wrist block has been used to provide pain relief
for many procedures on the hand and wrist but its role in arthroscopy
of the wrist remains unexplored. Chondrotoxicity has been a concern
with the intra-articular infiltration of local anaesthetic. We aimed
to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of portal and wrist
joint infiltration with a wrist block on the pain experienced by
patients after arthroscopy of the wrist. A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was designed and
patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist under general anaesthesia
as a day case were recruited for the study. Levo-bupivacaine was
used for both techniques. The effects were evaluated using a ten-point
visual analogue scale, and the use of analgesic agents was also
compared. The primary outcomes for statistical analyses were the
mean pain scores and the use of analgesia post-operatively. A total of 34 patients (63% females) were recruited to the portal
and joint infiltration group and 32 patients (59% males) to the
wrist block group. Mean age was 40.8 years in the first group and
39.7 years in the second group (p >
0.05). Both techniques provided
effective pain relief in the first hour and 24 hours post-operatively
but wrist block gave better pain scores at bedtime on the day of
surgery (p = 0.007) and at 24 hours post-operatively (p = 0.006). Wrist block provides better and more reliable analgesia in patients
undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist without exposing patients to
the risk of chondrotoxicity. Cite this article:
In Canada, Dupuytren's contracture is managed
with partial fasciectomy or percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA).
Injectable collagenase will soon be available. The optimal management
of Dupuytren’s contracture is controversial and trade-offs exist
between the different methods. Using a cost-utility analysis approach,
our aim was to identify the most cost-effective form of treatment
for managing Dupuytren’s contracture it and the threshold at which
collagenase is cost-effective. We developed an expected-value decision
analysis model for Dupuytren’s contracture affecting a single finger,
comparing the cost-effectiveness of fasciectomy, aponeurotomy and collagenase
from a societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness, one-way sensitivity
and variability analyses were performed using standard thresholds
for cost effective treatment ($50 000 to $100 000/QALY gained).
Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy was the preferred strategy for
managing contractures affecting a single finger. The cost-effectiveness
of primary aponeurotomy improved when repeated to treat recurrence.
Fasciectomy was not cost-effective. Collagenase was cost-effective
relative to and preferred over aponeurotomy at $875 and $470 per
course of treatment, respectively. In summary, our model supports the trend towards non-surgical
interventions for managing Dupuytren’s contracture affecting a single
finger. Injectable collagenase will only be feasible in our publicly
funded healthcare system if it costs significantly less than current
United States pricing. Cite this article:
